BP sues partners for Gulf disaster
It seems fitting that now the legal nightmares start up as BP sued the maker of the device that failed to stop last year’s Gulf oil spill and the owner of the rig that exploded, alleging that negligence helped cause the disaster.
One year ago, the Deepwater Horizon exploded, killing 11 and gushed 200 million of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. It seems fitting that now the legal nightmares start up as BP sued the maker of the device that failed to stop last year’s Gulf oil spill and the owner of the rig that exploded, alleging that negligence helped cause the disaster.
BP Wednesday, April 20th, sued rig owner Transocean for at least $40 billion in damages, accusing it of causing last year’s deadly blowout in the Gulf of Mexico that led to the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. BP says every single safety system and device and well control procedure on the Deepwater Horizon rig failed. BP filed the papers in federal court in New Orleans Wednesday.
It also is suing Cameron International, which provided a blowout preventer with a faulty design, which caused an unreasonable amount of risk that harm would occur. Both companies have filed counter claims against BP.
In addition, BP also sued cement contractor Halliburton claiming fraud, negligence and concealing material facts in connection with its work on the rig.
The filings are essentially legal maneuvers to preserve the companies’ claims. A federal trial will start up next year that will determine which companies are at fault and how much their liability should be.
The lawsuits, filed on the first anniversary of the explosion that led to the spill, seeks damages to help BP pay for the tens of billions of dollars in liabilities it has incurred from the disaster. Though BP has estimated its liabilities at $40.9 billion, it still could face tens of billions of dollars more in civil and criminal fines and penalties from the U.S. government.
“The Deepwater Horizon BOP was unreasonably dangerous, and has caused and continues to cause harm, loss, injuries, and damages to BP (and others) stemming from the blowout of Macondo well, the resulting explosion and fire onboard the Deepwater Horizon, the efforts to regain control of the Macondo well, and the oil spill that ensued before control of the Macondo well could be regained,” BP said in the lawsuit against Cameron.
BP wants the court to award the oil giant damages against Cameron and to declare the device maker caused or contributed to the disaster and is responsible for some or all costs incurred by BP.
Eleven people died when the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded on April 20, 2010, leading to more than 200 million gallons of oil spewing from an undersea well.
A testing firm hired by the government determined last month the blowout preventer had a faulty design. But it also cited other problems related to rig crew actions.
BP said in a statement that it wants Transocean to pay its “proportionate” share of all damages and liabilities from the disaster.
In a statement, Transocean called BP’s lawsuit “desperate,” ‘’specious,” and “unconscionable.”
“The Deepwater Horizon was a world-class drilling rig manned by a top-flight crew that was put in jeopardy by BP, the operator of the Macondo well, thorough a series of cost-saving decisions that increased risk — in some cases, severely,” Transocean said.
Cameron noted Wednesday was the deadline under the relevant statute for all parties to file claims against each other.