SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

What's the problem with overshoot?

09/10/2010


Dear Control Engineering: I was looking at Back to Basics in the August issue about closed loop control. What is the main concern about overshoot? Why is it a problem, and can’t a controller prevent it?

An ideal controller should be able to move a process variable quickly to the desired setpoint without shooting past. Sometimes controllers will push the variable aggressively toward the setpoint knowing that it may go past, or overshoot the desired value and have to turn around and come back. In many applications, this isn’t a problem. For example, let’s say you’re trying to control flow. The sensor is a flowmeter and the controller is a valve. Assuming everything is sized appropriately, the valve should be able to accommodate the desired flow easily, so it’s no big deal if it goes a little above or below the setpoint because it can easily reverse its effort.

But, let’s say you’re trying to control the temperature of a large tank of liquid by modulating the amount of natural gas to a burner. If the liquid is too cold and you’re trying to bring the temperature up quickly, the controller may turn the gas all the way up. However, if you overshoot the setpoint, the controller can do nothing to make the liquid cooler. There is no reverse effort available. Eventually some of the heat will dissipate and some might be carried away by a cooler feedstock coming into the tank, but there may be no counter control effort beyond turning the burner off.

To complicate things further, let’s say the tank is filled with vanilla pudding and overheating will cause it to burn. You want it to boil, but not get too hot. In those situations, the controller has to be programmed in a way that it will not pass the desired point or the product could be ruined.

Controllers can be programmed to avoid overshoot, but this is usually at the expense of aggressiveness. It has to slow the control effort more and more as it approaches the setpoint, which drags out the time required to hit the desired value.

For a more thorough discussion of the topic, read the article Understanding Derivative in Process Control, especially the sidebar written by Vance VanDoren.

--Pete Welander, pwelander(at)cfemedia.com



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
2013 Forecast Issue: A shift in manufacturing
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.