SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

Troubleshooting your airflow system

Learn a few tips to ensure production changes yield their full benefit.

Joe Gosney, PE, QEP, SSOE Group

01/03/2012


When a manufacturer makes a process change that delivers an increase in production, it may want to hold the applause until the system has run for 4 to 12 weeks. Process changes typically alter the airflow characteristics that were part of the system’s original design criteria—for example, the amount of process air, its temperature, its humidity, and the quantity of particulates and gases.

Changes in any of these characteristics can negatively impact the system’s performance, plant efficiency, and environmental permitting.

What’s the best course of action to avoid these risks and still reach your goal of increased production? Simply, use foresight by including people with the appropriate training and experience in the project planning stage. One should be an airflow expert who will understand how your proposed process changes will impact airflow and in turn how that will affect the air transport system. He or she will start by looking at the system’s original design criteria and operational parameters as well as the current parameters.

One or more of the following may be among the solutions for trouble-free results:

  • If the revised process is going to increase airflow beyond the capacity of the transport system or pollution control equipment, consider a change of fuel from natural gas combined with ambient air to natural gas and oxygen. This will remove the nitrogen from the combustion system, allowing the revised system to supply additional heat to the process, and may not require increasing the size of the pollution control system.
  • Modify the size of the ductwork to handle the increase or decrease in the air volume.
  • Increase the size of the pollution control equipment by adding another compartment to the bag house; change the material the bags are made out of or, if possible, increase the surface area of each bag to keep the air to cloth ratios the same; add volume to dropout boxes, or increase the number of cyclones.
  • Add another section or change the collection plate configuration of the electrostatic precipitator to increase its ability to efficiently remove particulate from the airstream.
  • Use more or less ambient air for cooling the airstream. If the system uses both ambient air and evaporative cooling, be sure the evaporative cooler can handle the additional heat load when the ambient air is reduced.
  • Have a good understanding of the chemistry of the airstream you are dealing with. Understand when materials in the airstream will be in a gaseous, liquid, and solid state. This information is valuable in determining when and where blockages and corrosion may occur in the transport system. History may tell you a buildup in the ductwork will occur where you have a cleanout door, but an increase or decrease in temperature or volume may move the area of the blockage out of the area of the cleanout door.

Joe Gosney’s full article on airflow as a factor in production management is one of the topics in Plant Engineering’s Forecast issue, which will be published in mid-February. To receive the digital edition of Plant Engineering in time for the Forecast issue, which also will feature the 2011 Plant Engineering Salary Survey, subscribe here (it's free!).



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
2013 Forecast Issue: A shift in manufacturing
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.