Stop! Is your machine safety life cycle program in place?
For machine safety, having a Safety Life Cycle Program in place sets the stage for increased compliance to OSHA regulations and consensus standards, and it helps drive a higher level of functional safety for each application.
J.B. Titus, CFSE
For machine safety, having a Safety Life Cycle Program in place, in my opinion, certainly sets the stage for increased compliance to OSHA regulations and consensus standards. It also helps drive a higher level of functional safety for each application by taking on a more practical approach to your safety system design.
I believe the system designers need to be willing to implement and apply various new safety technologies and approaches to drive the resulting benefits.
There are several approaches, models, and solutions for this approach to machine safety compliance. You can find a sample listing at the bottom of this blog. One thing consistent with each approach is that a successful Machine Safety Life Cycle program is definitely dependant on the respective Safety Culture within a company.
An existing strong and effective Safety Culture is needed to provide the foundation for this more detailed and systematic process for machinery applications. The functional safety life cycle is defined in IEC 61508 plus many of the example models involve five or six continuous life cycle steps for the safety system:
1) Risk Assessment & Hazard Analysis
2) Functional Specification
3) Design & Verification
4) Installation & Validation
5) Maintain & Continuous Improvement
What are your thoughts about this life cycle approach to machine safety compliance? Is your Safety Culture already in place and are you practicing the requirements of IEC 62061 and ISO 13849-1? These standards are performance based and designers/implementers of machine safety are able to actually quantify the value of safety. However, will this deterministic approach actually reduce the cost of machine guarding by developing an improved level of safety for each safety function? What about machine sustainability?
What’s your opinion?
Thanks for your prior comments. Please submit additional ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Stop! Is Your Machine Safety Life Cycle Program in Place?
Did you see the Safety Integration Webcast?
Related articles:
Safety Matters – Rockwell Automation
Safety Lifecycle Management – exida, Inc
Improving Manufacturing Performance through Intelligent Safety System Design
Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety.”
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.