Simplified Safety: UL Introduces New Functional Safety Marks

UL has introduced two new functional safety marks: the UL Functional Safety Listing Mark and the UL Functional Safety Recognized Component Mark.

03/24/2011


ULUL has introduced two new functional safety marks: the UL Functional Safety Listing Mark and the UL Functional Safety Recognized Component Mark.

Functional safety is that part of overall safety that depends on the correct functioning of safety-related control systems. It includes evaluations of:

  • Software
  • Hardware
  • Environmental Factors (e.g., electromagnetic compatibility, EMC)
  • Safety Lifecycle Management Processes

Functional safety examines the efficacy of the safety-related system by considering the input variables to a device and confirming that the activating quantities of the output are within its designed parameters/ratings. So it goes beyond the fire and electric shock safety associated with the traditional UL Listing Mark.

A unique aspect of a functional safety certification is the functional safety lifecycle management system audit.  The functional safety lifecycle management audit is a mechanism used to help reduce systematic problems from appearing in the design of a product. If, for example, you have a manufacturing process, the quality control measures that go into that process really dictate the quality of the product coming out. Many of these measures may be procedural in nature, and tied to documentation having to do with the product specification or functional safety standard to which the product aspires. So the functional safety lifecycle management audit looks at those elements of the manufacturer’s process that may impact the quality of the functional safety of the product being produced.

Functional safety management concerns both the development of new products and the maintenance of safety processes for released products, to make sure that should there be any changes in the product or failures in the field that these developments are considered carefully and correctly, and, when indicated, prompting modifications in accordance with the functional safety requirements.

Functional safety standards require the customer to specific a safety rating.  IEC and EN standards call this safety rating a Safety Integrity Level (SIL).  SILs range from 1-4 with 1 being the lowest and 4 being the hardest or most difficult to achieve.  ISO standards call the safety rating a Performance Level (PL).  PLs range from A-E with A being the lowest and E being the hardest or most difficult to achieve. 

In its Functional Safety Listing Mark, UL puts a product’s safety rating directly on the mark. This makes it simple for users to understand exactly what has been certified according to functional safety standards. UL’s Functional Safety Recognized Component Mark covers components or materials intended for use in an end product functional safety certification, whose safety cannot be certified by looking at the material or component alone, but has to be used in a specific context to satisfy functional safety requirements. Although additional considerations need to be looked at when integrating the component, the recognized component mark shows that UL has already evaluated the fundamental functional safety characteristics, which makes it easier for end users to integrate the component into their system.

The new marks can be added for those qualifying companies in the process of getting a traditional listing from UL.  The UL Functional Safety Listing Mark is available in U.S., Canadian and European designations. The UL Functional Safety Recognized Component Mark is available in U.S. and Canadian designations.

In essence, the Functional Safety Listing Mark replaces the traditional UL Listing Mark on products certified for functional safety. Manufacturers are not obliged to put both marks on their products; the Functional Safety Listing Mark is sufficient. However, those manufacturers wishing to put both marks on their product are welcome to do so.

“Once an integrator or manufacturer sees the UL Functional Safety Listing Mark and identifies a product as a component in their system, they can then look at the listing card for that product on UL’s Internet-based online certification directory to find more specific information such as hardware fault tolerance,” says Thomas Maier, principal engineer, functional safety, at UL. “This allows proper integration of the component into a larger system and maintains the safety level of the overall system. Knowing that this component is recognized for use in, say, up to SIL 3 systems, can streamline the process appreciably for the end user."

Manufacturers using these two new UL Marks will see immediate benefits, as both end users and systems integrators immediately have a higher level of confidence when using the marked product.

Among the functional safety standards UL can certify for the Functional Safety Listing Mark:

IEC 61508: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems

ISO 13849: Safety of machinery — Safety-related parts of control systems

IEC/EN 62061: Safety of machinery — Functional safety of safety-related electrical, electronic and programmable electronic control systems

IEC 61511: Functional safety — Safety instrumented systems for the process industry sector

IEC 61800-5-2: Adjustable speed electrical power drive systems — Part 5-2: Safety requirements — Functional

IEC 61496: Safety of machinery — Electro-sensitive protective equipment

EN 50271: Electrical apparatus for the detection and measurement of combustible gases, toxic gases or oxygen

EN 954: Safety of machinery. Safety related parts of control systems. General principles for design

ISO 10218: Robots for industrial environments — Safety requirements

UL 1998: Software in Programmable Components

UL 991: Safety-Related Controls Employing Solid-State Devices

ISO 26262: Road vehicles — Functional safety (draft standard; publish date 2011)

CSA C22.2 NO 0.8: Safety functions incorporating electronic technology

For more information on UL’s new functional safety marks, please contact: Kevin Connelly, 631-546-2691, kevin.connelly@us.ul.com

Or go to the web: www.ul.com/functionalsafety; Copyright 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.  All rights reserved. Used with permission for the Siemens Simplified Safety Newsletter.

www.usa.siemens.com/safety

See other articles in the Siemens Simplified Safety newsletter.

www.controleng.com/newsletter/siemens-simplified-safety.html



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.