SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

Process availability can pay big dividends

Does a making an investment in process improvement to increase system integrity during an era of reduced operating and capital budgets make sense?

By Kristen Barbour, Pepperl+Fuchs

06/15/2011


Does a making an investment in process improvement to increase system integrity during an era of reduced operating and capital budgets make sense? Yes, economic downturns are an ideal time to reduce expenses, including capital and operating expenses.

Courtesy: Pepperl+FuchsInvestments in process availability are an asset that will continue to provide savings to your facility over the lifecycle of the plant. In process plants all over the world are striving now more than ever to reduce operational expenditures while increasing productivity and efficiency. Process engineers place a tremendous amount of emphasis on system integrity requirements. Why? Because it’s a variable that can be controlled when the right equipment is in place.

The time value of money is also being affected by the recession. Most investment institutions are paying half of 1% for savings accounts, and maybe 3% for the long term of a certificate of deposit.

Consider the cost associated with an unplanned shutdown: The oil and gas and petrochemical industry estimates an unplanned process shutdown runs on average of more than $100,000 per day. What is the return on investments to avoid an unplanned shutdown?

The decision to invest in process integrity typically follows a few logical steps:

  • Pricing comparison of components available
  • Weighing the price difference against benefits
  • Past performance
  • Estimated return on additional investment.

Today modern industrial process facilities rely tremendously on the bulk power supplies that provide power not only the control system architecture but also to bus powered control and measurement instruments. These continuous production process applications require more than off-the-shelf industrial grade power supplies. A single power supply failure could have a catastrophic effect that equates to a tremendous amount of lost revenue.

This need for system integrity and guaranteed performance in these demanding conditions necessitates power redundancy. In the simplest terms, N+1 is a robust and affordable power supply redundancy method that guarantees continuous system functionality in the event of a single power supply failure. With redundancy‚ a supply failure will not initiate an emergency repair situation and can be replaced without shutting down the power system or the process.

The balanced load sharing of an N+1 power supply enables all of the modules to share the load evenly. This load sharing functionality is built-in to each power supply, without the need for an external diode module. Balanced load share ensures that one power module is not working harder than another, adding to the longevity of the power supply modules. N+1 power supplies are easily expandable in 15 A increments just by adding another module when the load requirement increases. The end result is a highly available and affordable redundant power solution.

A minimal investment spent for key components designed for system integrity results in an exponential ROI. This investment results in net present value increase that blows away any alternative uses of the funds.

If the local bank was offering a 28% interest rate on a CD, we would all be getting speeding tickets on the way to the bank to take advantage of this great ROI.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
2013 Forecast Issue: A shift in manufacturing
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.