Process Automation Systems
Reed Research Group surveyed Control Engineering subscribers in November 2008 about their use of process automation systems. Selected results presented here are based on 128 completed responses from subscribers who evaluate, specify, recommend, install, and/or purchase process automation systems (PAS).
Reed Research Group surveyed Control Engineering subscribers in November 2008 about their use of process automation systems. Selected results presented here are based on 128 completed responses from subscribers who evaluate, specify, recommend, install, and/or purchase process automation systems (PAS). Among these, 70% are involved with PAS solely for their own plants, while 14% do so only for OEM resale, and 16% for OEM or end user requirements, depending on the project. Overall, most respondents expect their spending on PAS to remain the same or decrease in 2009, compared to 2008.
Among other issues addressed in the survey, respondents were asked the most- and least-implemented capabilities of their process automation systems, and why they may not be fully using the capabilities of their current systems, if that is indeed the case. Results are shown in the graphics accompanying this article.
Using a list of PAS vendors, survey respondents also identified the following providers as leading suppliers of process automation systems: Rockwell Automation, Siemens Energy & Automation, Emerson Process Management, GE Fanuc Intelligent Platforms, ABB, Honeywell Process Solutions, Invensys Process Systems, Yokogawa Electric, Mitsubishi Electric Automation, and Schneider Electric. Representative products from these vendors are shown here. Additional results, links, and product information from these vendors are available with this article online at www.controleng.com/archives for January 2009.
Senior editor Renee Robbins can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org .
PAS capabilities desired
View the survey online to find advice about selecting PASs, and the extent of use of specific capabilities and functions, such as embedded loop tuning aids, wireless technology, or fieldbus support. When respondents were asked to write in important capabilities not on our list, they identified the following:
Ability to go into and edit reports
Cross functionality, with the ability to integrate with other control systems
Ease of troubleshooting from an operational view, access to troubleshooting HMI screens
Ease of use for field personnel (standard platforms and configurations, standard HMI and PLCs between projects and systems)
HMI embedded operating procedures tied to system control states (which helps with secure troubleshooting and maintenance)
Multi-integration interface for machine data collection of process performance
Protection from external networks (to avoid costly re-qualification of equipment after virus attacks)
Radio telemetry integration for remote management.
Remote diagnostic capabilities for system level and engineering sub-functions
Sample and demo code (makes it easier to configure and understand hardware and software relationships)
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.