New approaches for remote I/O installations

03/11/2013


Comparison

Each of the three traditional types of marshalling has distinct advantages and disadvantages. The half-knit approach is useful in brownfield projects or where RIEs are used. It is also useful in situations where marshalling is done on one side of a cabinet and the I/O terminals are on the other side. However, if using separate marshalling and system cabinets and conducting FAT offsite, half-knit marshalling is a less attractive option.

Fan-out marshalling is useful when system cables or separate marshalling and system cabinets are specified, when marshalling cabinets are required on site well in advance of system cabinets, or the exact field cable details are not known during the design. This type of marshalling is more flexible and reduces the on-site construction schedule compared to half-knit, but is more challenging from an overall lifecycle perspective.

Cross-wire marshalling offers more flexible scheduling, delivery, and FAT options, while reducing schedule risk. It also comes with better lifecycle benefits than half-knit or fan-out marshalling. This does come with an increased initial cost, though.

Remote I/O with universal channel technology

As noted earlier, all the marshalling paradigms above share the same end goal: Connect field devices to the control system. They all start with the same basic assumptions: Instrumentation is located in the field, with field wiring being collected at junction boxes, which are brought into the marshalling cabinets, with home run cables connected to cabinets of I/O modules at some central location. The only real difference here is how the multi-core cables are treated in the marshalling cabinets and how they are connected to the control system.

Traditional wiring practices place the final I/O module close to the DCS, which means the longest path to any individual field device. Courtesy: Honeywell Process Solutions

More modern remote I/O practices challenge the assumption or requirement that I/O modules are kept in some central location. Moving I/O modules out into the field and closer to process instruments can eliminate the need for multi-core cables and marshalling cabinets, greatly simplifying the field-to-control room architecture. There are several benefits in using this remote I/O approach, which include reducing cost, improving the overall project schedule, and minimizing risk:

  • Configurable channel remote I/O can reduce or eliminate marshalling. Since field signals can be landed directly on I/O terminals, the need for marshalling is eliminated. This has many benefits, including reductions in material costs, such as cabinets, conduits, home run cables, cable trays, and supports. It also reduces installed weight (important in floating production facilities), project labor costs, commissioning costs, and documentation costs.
  • The overall system footprint in the central control room is reduced because the I/O is located directly at the process. The only cable runs to the central control room are now the I/O communication cables.
  • Overall system flexibility is increased as spare channels are better utilized with more local options to I/O instead of being forced to wire back to a centralized location.
  • Fast-track projects are easier to accommodate as the system can be tested and shipped prior to completion of field designs.
  • Project execution efficiency is increased by standardizing supply chain requirements.

Many of these same benefits also apply to configurable universal channel technology, which allows for key modifications after control systems are commissioned and online. This approach drives on-site delivery schedules, since system engineering can be completed without impact from external design dependencies.

Configurable universal channel technology also liberates safety I/O, process I/O, and control cabinets from channel-type dependency. Universal I/O modules for both control and safety systems enable common design paradigms across an integrated control and safety system (ICSS). Any signal type can be connected to any channel without the need for additional hardware or interfacing modules. It also eliminates the need for custom hardware alignment with different I/O types. Cabinets can now be standardized, since any standard field signal can be connected to any I/O channel.

Moving I/O modules out into the field and closer to process instruments can eliminate the need for multi-core cables and marshalling cabinets, greatly simplifying the field-to-control room architecture. Courtesy: Honeywell Process Solutions

Because this approach can accept any signal type (analog, digital, input, or output), late arriving changes in the instrumentation package, as is commonplace in automation projects, can be accommodated through software configuration versus having to change the hardware. With universal I/O for both safety and process, project teams need only worry about I/O count and not the mixture of device types.

The configurable channel approach can not only reduce or even eliminate the need for marshalling but, most importantly, also allows immediate remote configuration. Theoretically, this would simplify engineering and configuration during the design stage of a project, and can save up to 33% of the installation costs. Late configuration changes can be done through remote access rather than having someone manipulating hardware in the field, so they can be handled in minutes rather than days.

Build in your shop, not the field

It is not difficult to imagine that cabinet requirements are also simplified by this approach. Often, the documentation required for design and fabrication of cabinets is not finalized in time to meet construction schedules on projects. This means that a lot of the cabinet assembly, testing, and configuration is done in the field, where costs are higher and efficient documentation is more difficult.

Universal cabinets are simply standard cabinets that are equipped with a configurable input capability. The resulting flexibility supports easy changes, additions, and modifications at any time without rewiring. The effort needed to obtain additional cabinets is minimized because the capabilities and resources of each cabinet can be determined in advance. Since there are no marshalling cabinets, the project ends up with an overall decreased footprint with lower installation and maintenance costs. Acceptance test schedules also are improved due to efficiencies in addressing late changes in I/O configuration. There are numerous other potential benefits:

  • Universal cabinets can improve the project schedule by reducing the amount of custom engineering and documentation compared to custom designing each cabinet. Having universal cabinets enables a faster delivery that is based only on I/O count, not I/O type distribution.
  • In addition to improved project schedules, universal cabinets can enable even faster and more cost-effective checkout.
  • Adding room for spare devices is much simpler. Since every I/O channel can be configured as any point type through software configuration only, it is simple to adapt to late wiring changes. Instead of allocating I/O modules of each point type, which may or may not be used, configurable I/O modules are available for multiple point types.
  • The total amount of I/O hardware is reduced. Here are two examples demonstrating a reduction in hardware needs. On a project with 5,000 I/O points, the total number of modules can be cut by as much as 35%. Even a small project can benefit since adding even one device with a different signal type requires adding a new module using traditional methods.
  • For plants where instrument locations are highly distributed, such as a refinery tank farm, universal I/O modules in universal cabinets can be a very cost-effective alternative to long cable runs or additional RIEs.

Configurable channel technology is also useful in system migrations, especially in space constrained control rooms. Universal I/O modules can result in a negative footprint solution, and the module flexibility gives it the ability to adapt to existing field wiring with scalability to add new signals.

Even without mounting universal I/O modules remotely in the field, there are still other benefits. Universal I/O modules can be used in RIEs and equipment rooms to reduce or eliminate the cross-wiring requirements associated with the marshalling strategies discussed earlier.

These new I/O module approaches are particularly well suited for scenarios where the process is highly distributed or is modular. It’s important to remember, though, that each situation is unique, and different plants will have to weigh the benefits and costs of implementing each method. At the very least, these new I/O technologies have widened the number of available options for solving problems that demand advanced functionality with less complex installation. And that’s a major advancement in itself.

Joe Bastone is solution manager, Experion control and I/O, for Honeywell Process Solutions.

Key concepts:

  • Traditional strategies for field wiring are proven, but can be costly and time consuming.
  • New types of modular I/O devices support moving that connection into the field, closer to the devices.
  • Software configurability of modules and individual channels allows for simpler hardware selection. 

Go online:

For more information, visit:
www.honeywellprocess.com

Read more on I/O strategy below:

Make your I/O smarter


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

Jonas , , 08/10/13 02:10 AM:

In principle I personally think we should move beyond conventional hardwired signals like 4-20 mA and different kinds of on/off signals, also for the “first meter” between the sensor/actuator and junction box.. The system shall be networked with digital communication all the way down to sensors and actuators like transmitters and positioners. That is, the first meter from junction box to individual instruments shall also be real-time digital communication. In other words, digital closed loop control from sensor to actuator, from field to control room. Instead of running multiple conventional signal wires per device (2 or 3 signals per control valve or on/off valve, maybe 6-12 signals per electric actuator, 2 or 3 per level and flow transmitter) you instead just branch out a fieldbus trunk cable from the junction box to each device, handling all signals in that device. 5,000 conventional I/O points becomes 1,700 fieldbus devices

By fieldbussing the I/O, you don’t need enlarged I/O enclosures in the field and need not put any I/O cards in the harsh field environment. Instead of system cards in large field cabinets, you retain small simple passive field junction boxes suitable for zone 2 or 1. There is no need to send system technicians to the field for service on I/O cards.
Each bus is designed for 10 devices but can be expanded up to 12, 14, or even 16 devices. Additional signals for each device such as feedback can be added in devices without using I/O channels
It doesn’t matter if a device is a sensor or actuator, regulator or discrete in nature, because the fieldbus interface card and safety barrier is the same, so device types can change late in the project without requiring redesign. Cross-wiring is eliminated
http://www.fieldbus.org/images/stories/technology/aboutthetechology/overview/fieldbus_brochure.pdf
Fieldbus also lends itself well to this concept. See for instance this FPSO:
http://www2.emersonprocess.com/siteadmincenter/PM%20Articles/worldoil0709_fpso.pdf
Fieldbus on mammoth modular construction on-shore projects is also done. For instance this Alumina plant:
http://www2.emersonprocess.com/siteadmincenter/PM%20Central%20Web%20Documents/QBRAlcanGove13dec.pdf
http://www.jumpaboard.org/JA07info/SLIDES/MP-G3s3f.pdf
http://my.alacd.com/tms/2006/papers/115.pdf
Fieldbus is also ideal for those "nice to have features". You can access all those 12-16 signals in an electric actuator / motor operated valve (MOV) or other devices.
I personally believe signals should be digital all the way; no 4-20 mA or on/off signals, like many plants already do with fieldbus. Transmitters are digital, controllers are digital, and positioners are digital, why should they have an analog signal between them? Some vibrating fork level switches and on/off valves now have intelligence, why should there be an on/off signal to isolate them from the rest of the digital nervous system that cover the plant. Only with fieldbus can we say we have real-time “communication with field instrumentation and devices” and a truly “digital plant”. Cameras are digital, phones are digital, mail is digital, music is digital, video is digital, and TV is digital etc. Process control should also be digital such that more plants can reap the benefits of digital.
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.