Machinery Directive In 4 Days Drops EN 954 and EN ISO 13849-1 Is Fully In Force: What’s Your Impact?

In Europe on Jan. 1, 2012 the qualitative process (EN 954) of machine safety hazard identification (B, 1, 2, 3, and 4) and mitigation disappears and the quantitative process (EN ISO 13849-1) is fully in force with its compliance requirements of Performance Level (a, b, c, d, and e). The Category system is officially put to rest and hence forth all safety circuit (electrical, hydraulic, or pneumatic) must follow these new prescriptive requirements. But, here in the United States how does this change affect your business?

12/27/2011


JB Titus, CFSEIn Europe on Jan. 1, 2012 the qualitative process (EN 954) of machine safety hazard identification (B, 1, 2, 3, and 4) and mitigation disappears and the quantitative process (EN ISO 13849-1) is fully in force with its compliance requirements of Performance Level (a, b, c, d, and e). The Category system is officially put to rest and hence forth all safety circuit (electrical, hydraulic, or pneumatic) must follow these new prescriptive requirements. But, here in the United States how does this change affect your business?

   Bloggers have had a field day for the past two years posting numerous blogs on the second and final postponement of de-activating EN 954 via the Machinery Directive. Multiple articles have been written by industry experts. Automation suppliers have developed; posters, presentations, forums, books, web based training, and videos. This blog site has had no shortage of provocative attention to this subject either. European industry can no longer avoid the transition for machine safety compliance.

   Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM’s) and integrators engineer safety circuits every day as a normal course of their business. So, to build a machine or safety control system compliant to the Machinery Directive and EN ISO 13849-1 should be a manageable transition. Particularly since the first step of legal compliance in Europe is directed at the OEM and integrator firm. In the United States OSHA is the law and the first step of legal compliance is directed at the end user.

   As a core business practice, do end users in the US engineer safety circuits every day?

   In my opinion, the answer to this question is emphatically – NO! So, how will this influence emerging from Europe affect your business in the U.S.? The answer to this question varies dramatically because……..it depends.

   First, a little history as I understand it. EN stands for European Norm and U.S. standards have historically not referenced EN standards normatively. IEC and ISO standards are international in scope and the US has representatives participating on these standards committees. IEC and ISO standards are working their way into domestic standards and EN ISO 13849-1 is finding its way into our U.S. standards. Therefore, the qualitative process from EN 954 (extracted, modified, and adopted) in US standards has started to be updated and modified to the quantitative requirements of EN ISO 13849-1. One of the issues U.S. standards writers are grappling with is how to require US end users (large and small) to comply with these safety circuit design requirements.

   So, “it depends” really boils down to timing in my opinion. I believe many U.S. standards will have addressed the compliance requirements of EN ISO 13849-1 within three to five years based on their regular update cycles. Today and during this time frame you might address these requirements differently based on whether your business is domestically focused versus internationally focused. Or, whether your standards have completed their update cycle recently? My suggestion is to always check for the latest issue of your standards. Several tools are available from automation suppliers (listed below) and they’ll help you in your transition to the new requirements.         

   Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machinery Directive In 4 Days Drops EN 954 and EN ISO 13849-1 Is Fully In Force – What’s Your Impact?

   Related articles:

How To Integrate Safety

Rockwell Automation ROI Tool

Siemens Safety Evaluation Tool

PILZ PAScal Safety Calculator

Rockwell Automation SISTEMA

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.