Machine Safety: Wireless and cableless are similar but different
Know the differences, when considering machine safety, between wireless and cableless. As an analogy, is your hand held smart phone, with all its Internet, social media, photograph and movie capabilities, wireless or cableless?
Those involved with machine safety should know the distinctions between wireless and cableless. As an analogy, is your hand held smart phone, with all its Internet, social media, photograph and movie capabilities, wireless or cableless?
In the realm of machine safety, wireless communication and control has advanced significantly over the past few years. It seems just yesterday that an individual with a hand held operator control panel could walk around a robot or a section of a machine to program or modify settings. This hand held operator control panel could send and receive communication and control signals wirelessly but was connected to the robot or machine with a defined length of cable. This cable supplied electrical power to the hand held operator panel and certain actuators on the operator panel were hard wired back to the main control system. These were typically actuators for functions like start, stop or emergency stop. Therefore, this operator panel transmitted and received defined communication and control signals wirelessly, but it was not a cableless operator panel.
Now, fast forward to today. Since the development of safety certified control and communication devices, we now have safety certified wireless capability. Therefore, the control signals that previously required hard wiring via cabling can now be accomplished wirelessly along with the general communication and control. This then only leaves only one requirement for a defined cable and that is to provide electrical power to the hand held operator panel. The developments of battery power and low voltage technology combine to enable a cableless operator panel thereby eliminating the need for any hard connection to robots or machinery. Now the word cableless has meaning as relates to machine control.
Hard wired power cables or not?
So, wireless and cableless are similar because both hand held operator panels are capable of transmitting and receiving signals via wireless technology. They differ because wireless still requires hard wiring for electrical power and this limits its ability to be hand carried beyond the length of its defined cable. Cableless hand held operator panels are no different than your smart phone or Apple iPhone. Cableless operator panels can be carried anywhere. This, of course, creates a whole host of new issues that robot and machine safety standards are addressing.
Do you have machine safety questions related to cableless versus wireless? Do you use a wireless interface integrated with machine safety? Add your comments or thoughts to the discussion by submitting your ideas, experiences, and challenges in the comments section below.
Machine Safety: Cableless versus wireless
Cableless (wireless) operator panel applications
How to choose wireless technology for industrial applications
Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety.”
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.