Machine Safety: Safe enough versus compliance, 8 compliance best practices
How does “safe enough” compare to “compliance”? It doesn't. Not having accidents for a period of time doesn't mean there isn't risk. See these eight machine safety compliance best practices.
With machine safety, how does “safe enough” compare to “compliance”? There's no comparison. The explanation is clearly provided by Bill Hilton, director of health and safety at Georgia-Pacific: “A historical lack of accidents does not imply a current presence of safety. It simply means you’ve been faster than the machine.”
Generally the term “safe enough” means: there’s been no risk assessment, no formal hazard mitigation, no thorough safety function evaluation, and probably no effective engineering of a proper safety solution. If this approach isn’t bad enough, don’t count on it to be well documented either.
Eight best practices follow that might help you better achieve “compliance” versus that downward spiral associated with “safe enough.”On the other hand, to be in “compliance” for a given hazard generally means: a current risk assessment is on file, the hazard mitigation process is formalized, there has been a formal safety function evaluation, and the safety solution was effectively engineered. Therefore, all the organizational puzzle pieces are effectively integrated.
1. Have all risks and hazards actually been identified?
2. Do you have copies of all appropriate safety standards?
3. How thoroughly are the identified risk levels defined and scored?
4. How effectively are the identified hazards mitigated?
5. Have you met or exceeded all OSHA regulations and requirements?
6. Have you met or exceeded your company’s safety policy requirements?
7. Is your process effectively documented?
8. Does your safety culture celebrate safety success stories?
Do you have some best practices you could share which elevate your machine safety program to be in compliance?
Do I have them all? would you add a ninth? Do you have some specific topic or interest that we could cover in future blog posts? Add your comments or thoughts to the discussion by submitting your ideas, experiences, and challenges in the comments section below.
Contact: http://www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
- Survey Prize Winners
- CFE Edu
Annual Salary Survey
Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.
There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.
But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.
Read more: 2015 Salary Survey