Machine Guarding: Tolerable vs residual risk

Why do so many colleagues in manufacturing choose to avoid the terms – tolerable risk and residual risk? If there’s one thing “integrated safety systems” and requirements for risk assessments have brought to the industrial forefront over the past ten years – it’s risk awareness. It’s now “OK” in conversation and correspondence within companies to use words like; risk, safety, mitigation, hazard, and consequences – all in one paragraph.

11/11/2011


JB Titus, CFSEWhy do so many colleagues in manufacturing choose to avoid the terms – tolerable risk and residual risk? If there’s one thing “integrated safety systems” and requirements for risk assessments have brought to the industrial forefront over the past ten years – it’s risk awareness. It’s now “OK” in conversation and correspondence within companies to use words like; risk, safety, mitigation, hazard, and consequences – all in one paragraph.

    So, is there any difference between “tolerable risk” and “residual risk”?

    In my opinion, yes! First, let’s start with residual risk. Residual risk is defined by ANSI B11 – 2008 (General Safety Requirements Common to ANSI B11 Machines) as; “risk remaining after protective measures (risk reduction measures) have been taken”. Furthermore, a commonly understood fact is that there will always be some level of residual risk for a given hazard after all risk reduction measures have been applied. In other words, residual risk will never equal zero. Let’s draw this machine safety an analogy with everyday life. Almost daily we get into our automobile and drive some distance to go to the store, work, school, etc. and we have experienced the residual risk associated with this experience. Many risk reduction measures have been applied by; the automobile manufacturer, the State Department of Transportation, the highway developer, the licensing department, etc. and the local police department is the enforcement agency. Therefore, everyone in the automobile has understood the residual risk associated with this experience acknowledging that there still is some risk which means it cannot equal zero.

    Now, what is tolerable risk? Tolerable risk is defined by ANSI B11 – 2008 as; “risk that is accepted for a given task (hazard situation) or hazard. For the purpose of this standard the terms “acceptable risk” and “tolerable risk” are synonymous”. The standard goes on to say that; “The expression “acceptable risk” refers to the level at which further risk reduction will not result in significant reduction of risk; or additional expenditure of resources will not result in significant advantages of increased safety”. In my opinion, this definition means that all risk reduction measures have been taken to mitigate the given hazard in order to reduce the risk to a tolerable risk level. My experience is that various companies define tolerable risk levels which are indigenous to; their industry, their business model, the individual hazard, the competency level of employees they are able to hire, the level of local enforcement, and so forth. It’s sort of like the difference in driving a car in Lexington, Kentucky versus Mumbai, India. I would very likely define my level of tolerable risk very differently in Mumbai to the point that I probably would not even attempt to drive an automobile.

     Now, is it possible that residual risk and tolerable risk may equal the same level? Of course! However, they are very different in my opinion because of different definitions and because their approaches are very different.

    What is your opinion?

    Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Guarding: Tolerable vs residual risk.

    Related articles:

Residual Risk Is Alive & Ever Present

Machine safety pays off

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.