Machine guarding and the hierarchy of measures for hazard mitigation
Do you know the five levels of hazard mitigation? Machine guarding isn’t completed task that’s checked off a list. Eliminate, isolate, add engineering, implement controls, and use PPE, then repeat.
Industry is learning about the “hierarchy of measures” for hazard mitigation as more work is accomplished on the changing landscape of machine guarding. None of these measures are new to industry. However, documenting the process and organizing your thoughts is somewhat new. Do you know what the five levels are for hazard mitigation?
Machine guarding is a process and not an event. As a result of innovation the most effective machine guarding can now begin in the design stage and no longer needs to be an afterthought and added during installation. Hence, the process begins with the risk assessment to identify all of the hazards. It’s at this stage that the hazards can be eliminated with the least cost or investment. Therefore, the process of hazard mitigation begins at this point. In many cases the design phase continues and so does the hazard identification and hazard mitigation. This is why it’s important to know, understand, and practice the risk assessment requirement as a living process and document.
So, what are the five levels of hazard mitigation in machine guarding?
1) Eliminate the hazard – design it out
2) Isolate the hazard with hard guarding
3) Add additional engineering, guards, devices, or layers of safety
4) Implement administrative controls like – training, signage, assessments, etc.
5) Use personal protective equipment (PPE) like - goggles, gloves, outer clothing, shields, etc.
All five levels are fully acceptable risk mitigation solutions to achieve that “acceptable” level of mitigated risk. In my opinion, that acceptable level of risk for a given hazard is intentionally left undefined because you are the one who defines the tolerable level of risk you’re willing to accept.
Is this process working in your safety culture?
Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Guarding & The Hierarchy of Measures for Hazard Mitigation
Did you see the Safety Integration Webcast?
Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.