Load-bank testing ensures performance, reliability
Maintaining genset performance, health, and reliability depends on performing regularly scheduled load-bank testing.
Jeff Ballas, DynaTech, Lebanon, Pa.
Load-bank tests assure facility managers that their generators will perform well at 100% of their nameplate rating. The absence of regular load-bank testing dramatically increases the potential risk of generator failure during an emergency. Load-bank testing should be a regular part of a generator maintenance program to avoid mechanical failure caused by extreme stress on the engine and other components when the generator is used in a power outage (see Figure 1). It also helps maintain vital engine system parameters such as oil pressure and coolant temperature while preventing wet stacking and carbon buildup.
Wet stacking occurs when unburned fuel accumulates in the exhaust system due to running the generator at less than full load and therefore not producing enough heat to burn off the excess fuel. This accumulation can reduce engine lifecycle and efficiency by fouling the fuel injectors, engine valves, and exhaust system. If the correct mixture of fuel and air is not maintained, the engine will not operate at its highest level and will deliver less power.
As with wet stacking, carbon buildup typically occurs when the generator’s engine runs at less than full load, producing insufficient heat to remove the buildup. If carbon buildup continues unchecked, over time the piston rings can seize, which could allow the superheated fuel/air mixture to sneak past the rings and scorch the sides of the pistons (see Figure 2).
A load bank applies a stable controllable electrical load on a generator. It can be permanent or portable, can accommodate ac or dc, and can range from a few kW to multiple MW. Most load-bank units have an internal fan that cools the resistive elements and discharges the high temperature air away from the unit. It is very important to properly position the load-bank unit away from combustible material and to ensure that it is operated in a well-ventilated environment to keep it—and the generator—from overheating.
The two types of load-bank testing methods are resistive and reactive. Resistive is the most common field testing method because it encompasses the full kW rating of the generator and the engine systems, such as the cooling, exhaust, and fuel delivery system. Reactive testing is typically performed at the genset factory to test kVA ratings.
Load-bank testing schedule
Generators must be able to go from a cold start to a full load in a matter of seconds. Just as the human body needs to be stretched and warmed up before a 100-yard sprint, the generator must be exercised at 30% load for at least 30 min monthly. Testing at this level and frequency keeps engine parts lubricated, prevents oxidation of electrical contacts, consumes fuel before it deteriorates, and enables reliable engine starting.
An annual load-bank test should be performed at 100% of the generator’s kW capacity for a minimum of 1 hr, or loaded to the minimum engine exhaust temperature recommended by the engine manufacturer. The load-bank test should be performed by stepping up the load at certain time intervals (see Table 1).
One of the goals of load-bank testing is to discover problems in a controlled situation rather than during an actual power failure. The following list suggests tips for discovering problems safely:
· When performing load-bank tests, be prepared for system failure, unexpected results, or the worst-case scenario.
· A backup generator should be in place at mission critical sites such as healthcare facilities with patients on life support, or any facility that absolutely cannot afford a power interruption.
· For facilities that are not mission critical, testing should occur during hours that can most easily manage a power failure—just in case.
· Ensure the generator is disconnected from the facility to prevent overloading.
· When testing, look for loose connections, leaks, and abnormal performance.
· An engine that emits black exhaust during the testing period typically is running at a high enough temperature to burn away the carbon buildup and the fuel in the exhaust system. However, if the smoke does not clear before the testing is completed, engine repairs may be necessary. Extensive smoke is most often caused by rings that have never seated properly, by a fuel pump that must be rebuilt, or by bad fuel.
· Other common occurrences during testing include high cooling system temperature and low oil pressure. High temperature can be due to a faulty thermostat or a restriction in the system. Low oil pressure can be the result of an oil pump in need of repair or an indication of excessive engine wear.
Load-bank testing should be incorporated into a regular generator maintenance schedule to ensure peak performance and maximum reliability. Testing allows the operator to determine if the genset can run at its full kW capacity (without the risk of having to use the facility’s electrical distribution system and its load). Regularly-scheduled load-bank testing removes unused fuel in the exhaust and carbon buildup in the engine that can damage the genset and compromise its ability to produce emergency power when it’s needed most.
Ballas is the sales team leader for DynaTech, a generator sales and service company in Lebanon, Pa. He has experience creating and selling preventive maintenance agreements for air compressor and emergency generator systems.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.