Just who is the customer and what does he really want?

Sometimes there are objectives for a project that are hidden below the surface. Can you satisfy those?


The customer is the individual who pays the bills. The customer is the group that will use the product. The customer is the executive who judges how well the project meets the business needs of the company. We could add more examples to the list, but each of these customers looks at a project slightly differently and judges it in unique ways. As engineers, we must always try to understand these different viewpoints and be responsive to the needs of the various voices that speak for a collective customer. If we do not understand how different stakeholders offering input on a project might be in conflict with each other, we open ourselves up for some nasty surprises.

Some years ago, I was part of a team installing a SCADA system in a food production facility. We were layering data collection and reporting on top of existing line automation. The request for the project and the contract came from the corporate office. It was to be a pilot for similar SCADA systems at a number of facilities.

Design, installation, and startup went smoothly. We were in the training stage, teaching plant maintenance about system health monitoring and details of preventative maintenance, when one technician said to me, “Thanks, but all I need to know are where the weak points are.” I was definitely surprised by this odd request, and our team went to work trying to find out what was going on behind the scenes.

It seems that prior to this project, the plant manager ran the facility as his private kingdom; the only real data received by the corporate headquarters was what he chose to send them in his reports. Our system, by providing raw production data that would be difficult to alter, threatened his autonomy. He was not able to prevent our project from being installed, but he fully intended to make sure it stopped working the moment we were out the door. After some very thoroughly documented testing to prove we had met all the technical requirements and some renegotiated warranty terms, we moved on, leaving the plant and corporate headquarters to fight things out amongst themselves.

In retrospect, it is hard to see how we might have handled the situation differently once we were on site implementing the project. This kind of resistance to our success needed to be identified during the sales meetings or scope development process, but such things are difficult to draw into the open. Unfortunately in this case, those phases of the project process involved the corporate group rather than the plant group. It’s natural to assume that everyone working on a project at the customer company has the same desire for success. They all work for the same company, after all. But in this case, by trusting that the customers at the plant had the same motivations and views as the customers in the corporate office, we failed to identify this grave threat to the success of the project.

This post was written by Robert Henderson. Robert is a principal engineer at MAVERICK Technologies, a leading system integrator providing industrial automation, operational support and control systems engineering services in the manufacturing and process industries. MAVERICK delivers expertise and consulting in a wide variety of areas including industrial automation controls, distributed control systems, manufacturing execution systems, operational strategy, and business process optimization. The company provides a full range of automation and controls services – ranging from PID controller tuning and HMI programming to serving as a main automation contractor. Additionally MAVERICK offers industrial and technical staffing services, placing on-site automation, instrumentation and controls engineers.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.