SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

Intrinsic Safety available without power limits

DART System from Pepperl+Fuchs enables process users to take full advantage of the benefits of fieldbus technology in intrinsic safety environments

SOURCE: Pepperl+Fuchs

04/04/2011


Pepperl+Fuchs’s Dynamic Arc Recognition and Termination System (DART) is a dynamic power supply and control system for intrinsically safe fieldbus installations that dramatically increases the power available to field devices in explosion hazardous areas, while maintaining intrinsically safe energy levels.

“The DART system supplies enough power to support nearly as many devices as is typically supplied in non-hazardous areas, and can also power field instruments that previously required more power than intrinsically safe solutions could offer,” says David Hohenstein, Department Manager, Pepperl+Fuchs. “What makes DART so unique is that it enables process users to fully benefit from the advantages of fieldbus technology in hazardous area applications such as ensuring system availability and lowering total cost of ownership.”

Early intrinsic safety solutions included the entity concept and FISCO. These enabled users to connect multiple devices to a single power supply on a fieldbus segment, but the low available power limited the number of devices per segment and reachable cable distance, forcing users to design complex bus topologies with many branches, and making fieldbus more difficult to cost-justify. More recently, the High-Power Trunk Concept (HPTC) provided users with safe installation in explosive environments, with more power supplied to the fieldbus segment while maintaining intrinsic safety at the device connection. DART represents a revolutionary next step in the evolution of intrinsic safety.

“DART is an exciting and superior option because it eliminates the power problem of intrinsic safety with a completely new approach to energy limitation. It allows for considerable higher direct power, while maintaining limitations on intrinsically safe energy via rapid disconnection,” explains Hohenstein. “Rather than taking a traditional approach to explosion prevention by limiting the available power to field devices, the DART system detects a fault condition by its characteristic rate of current change, and disconnects power before sparking can start.”

During normal operation, a DART power supply feeds full nominal power of 8 to 50 watts –more power than the approximately two watts that is normally permissible in intrinsic safety environments. Should a fault occur the potential spark remains non-incendive, and DART detects the resulting change in current and immediately switches off the power supply. In microseconds energy from the electrical system is reduced to a safe level, robbing a spark of the energy needed to ignite hazardous gases.

DART applied to fieldbus provides a higher intrinsically safe power allowance to the trunk so that the segment can support up to about 32 devices per segment – the maximum permitted per segment. This reduces capital costs by eliminating excessive fieldbus infrastructure. Moreover, cable lengths as long as 1000 meters are possible, opening up many application areas to fieldbus technology while maintaining intrinsic safety requirements for all devices and cables, including the trunk line. The higher device count per segment eliminates the problem of having to design complex network topologies with many sub-segments, each requiring its own power supply, junction boxes, and barriers.

DART technology also offers advanced diagnostics to help users rectify problems quickly and ensure system availability. And because DART Fieldbus is designed as a fieldbus infrastructure for existing IS field devices and DCS systems, or for any installation in which an intrinsically safe fieldbus segment is required, it is suitable for both green- and brown field sites.

www.pepperl-fuchs

Pepperl+Fuchs

- Edited by Gust Gianos, Plant Engineering, www.plantengineering.com



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
2013 Forecast Issue: A shift in manufacturing
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.