Handling the World Wide Web
MECHATRONICS IN DESIGN: Fresh ideas on integrating mechanical systems, electronics, control systems, and software in design, defense systems, consumer products, manufacturing. Before the WWW, engineers were handling webs at astonishing speeds.
Kevin C. Craig, Ph.D., Marquette University
The word web means different things to different people. To some, web conjures up images of Spider Man with his astonishing web, while for most others, it is the pervasive World Wide Web. However, for many engineers, the word web brings to mind the pervasive and astonishing material web used in many processes that make the majority of the products we all use. Let’s explore this overlooked material-handling app1lication that is indispensable in so many diverse industries. And while we are doing that, let’s ask the question why there is a gap and time lag between the latest technological advances in web handling and actual industrial practice, an observation not unique to this application.
Academic rigor and the best practices of industry need to be merged in an understandable, usable way for innovation to occur and result in tangible advances.
The economic advantage of manufacturing a material continuously instead of in batches is clear. The inputs and throughputs to continuous manufacturing processes are usually webs. A web is defined as a long, thin, flexible material with negligible bending stiffness about two of its three axes. Major classes of web materials include film, foil, food, paper, nonwovens, rubber, textiles and composites of these. Materials range from centimeter-thick metals to micron-thick plastics, widths range from single thin strands to more than 10m, and line speeds range to more than 2,500 m/min.
The goal of web handling is getting a web through a machine as fast as possible with minimum damage and waste, while preserving the web’s properties. Web manufacturing forms the raw-material web (e.g., paper making, film extrusion, textile spinning), while web converting (e.g., coating, laminating, printing, sheeting) takes one or more web materials and permanently alters them in some fashion either by changing material properties or causing geometrical / physical changes.
Web manufacturing and converting are often done by a combination of mostly art (trial-and-error) and a little bit of science, depending on the industry. However, all webs follow the same laws of physics — if we know the physics, we know the behavior. Web handling is an exact science with model-based design rules; all webs behave fundamentally the same way when pulled through a machine under tension. There even exists a wealth of literature and experts (e.g., D.H. Carlson, 3M Corp.; P.R. Pagilla, Oklahoma State University; and M.D. Weaver, Rockwell Automation) in this area. Monitoring and controlling web velocity and tension is a common web-handling challenge.
The use of a model-based design approach, rather than a trial-and-error design approach, is fundamental in modern mechatronic system design. Why is this approach not more widespread when applied to webs? There is a gap, and time lag, between the academic/research world and the world of industrial practice. More than 10 years ago, Dennis Bernstein wrote an article in the IEEE Control Systems Magazine entitled “On Bridging the Theory / Practice Gap.” It was timely then and even more so now. In this article, he outlines that both sides contribute to the problem.
So what needs to happen to bridge this gap? Academic rigor and the best practices of industry need to be merged in an understandable, usable way for innovation to occur and result in tangible advances. On the academic side, professors need to get out of their comfort zone and make each course — from freshman year through the graduate programs — not just a textbook course but an up-to-date fusing of academic rigor and best industrial practice with actual industry case studies as examples. Too hard, too challenging? This is what transformational engineering education is all about.
On the industrial side, companies need to recognize that their competitive advantage comes from an inspired, educated workforce and that should be their primary concern. Too often the training budget is the first to be cut with the view that technological advances somehow arrive with the morning newspaper. Too harsh an assessment? I do not think so, and I do not believe the rest of the world thinks so either.
- Kevin C. Craig, Ph.D., is Robert C. Greenheck Chair in Engineering Design & Professor of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Marquette University.
Visit the Mechatronics Zone for the latest mechatronics news, trends, technologies and applications: http://designnews.hotims.com/27744-542.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.