Gather the data to look at the true value of a safety system

“Safety system” is an apt description for a never-ending operational process.

11/04/2011


In the past 3 years, I have noticed a substantial increase (more than 700%) in the number of calls and e-mails I have received from colleagues and friends who are involved in various manufacturing operations.

The reason for the increase appeared simple: a request for help related to safety issues or compliance with OSHA regulations in their segments. I continue to experience resistance when explaining the basic fundamentals of safety to operation managers, most of whom appear to be committed only to throughput.

It is easily discernable that the majority of those who exhibit this lack of knowledge do not understand the long-term benefits of a serious and committed plant, equipment, and resource safety system. I deliberately do not use the words “safety program” here as the word “program” is best used to describe something that has a beginning and an end.

“Safety system” is an apt description for a never-ending operational process.

So why all the recent fuss? Well, in May of this year, OSHA announced a new initiative that will target the various metals industries, most of which are located in the Great Lakes Basin. This includes Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New York, Indiana, and Ohio.

The astonishing thing about the calls and e-mails I have received is the mind-set of the friends and colleagues I have communicated with concerning compliance. Of the 317 emails and 281 phone calls I have received in the past three years, only six colleagues have expressed concern with upgrading their safety systems to improve operating safety standards, as opposed to the majority asking, “How can we become at least minimally compliant?”

In almost every case where safety systems have been correctly installed, an improvement in throughput has been realized. So why is there so much resistance to properly installing safety systems?

Because the overall perception from management and employees alike is that it’s a hassle and it means they must learn a new and/or improved method of producing goods.

The immediate reaction is, “Sheesh, well this will waste an incredible amount of time, resources, and finances.”

So let’s examine the true actual cost of not having a properly maintained safety system in place.
Consider whether any of the following are applicable and if any show an increase or decrease within your operations.

  • LTIs (lost time incidents)
  • RIs (recordable incidents)
  • Medical insurance claims
  • Workman's compensation claims
  • Increase in employee absenteeism.

If you are experiencing any one of the above listed items, I will wager you have issues with all of the other items. And if you want the full scope of the effect these have on your operations and bottom line, get together with your human resources, medical, engineering, and operations staff and start comparing notes and costs.

Once you start the process of actually mining the data, it is quite easy to demonstrate the true cost associated with not having a well-rounded safety system in place.

Once you have assimilated all of the costs and add these costs into the costing/profit margins of your operations, I can assure you that you will have the undivided attention of those who actually count the beans.

Contact Dyer at dyerjerry(at)gmail.com.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.