Gas Technology: Condensing hydronic boilers
Getting the most for your energy dollar
It’s a clever idea. Condensing hydronic boilers can operate at efficiencies in the mid-90s and above. The key to these fantastic efficiencies is to have incoming feedwater at temperatures below 140° F, and to be able to either modulate the boiler or have sufficient redundancy that operating units can be held near their efficiency “sweet spot.”
Extract More Heat from Combustion Exhaust
Hydronic boilers can be used for either building heat or for process hot water applications. The condensing boiler extracts latent heat, in addition to sensible heat, from combustion exhaust. For new natural gas-fired units, the efficiency difference is typically about 10% higher. This presumes that the return water is low enough in temperature to permit a high level of condensation from the combustion exhaust.
Efficiencies as High as 97%
Cleaver-Brooks is one of the leaders in the manufacture of condensing hydronic boilers. Duane Rolkosky, Regional Vice President of the firm was a recent presenter at a Technology and Market Assessment Forum sponsored by the Energy Solutions Center. In his presentation he demonstrated that with a 130° F single return water flow, the boiler could achieve efficiencies as high as 90%. By using a dual return with 90% of the return flow at 150° F and 10% at 80° F, efficiencies as high as 97% were achievable. The 80° F portion of the flow helped achieve the nearly-complete condensation of water in the combustion exhaust.
Another Cleaver-Brooks spokesperson, Alan Wedal, Product Manager – Packaged Boilers, indicates there is growing acceptance of the condensing hydronic boiler in the marketplace. “The order entry level for our condensing units has remained strong and continued to increase significantly over the last three years. Certain areas of the country have adopted this technology more strongly than others.” He feels that the influences on growing adoption of the technology are incentives and rebates, design engineer experience, and owner knowledge.
Alufer Tube for Better Heat Exchange
A relatively recent introduction by Cleaver-Brooks is their ClearFire Condensing unit. Wedal notes that the patented Alufer tube in this unit greatly increases the heat transfer surface area and also allows a higher heat transfer coefficient through the use of aluminum alloy fins, and a design to keep the flue gas flow turbulent through the entire length of the tube.
Wedal notes that many owners are experiencing a 20% to 30% reduction in fuel consumption by replacing older boilers with newer units. He points out, “This is happening in some cases even without the use of condensing boilers, due to more efficient unit designs, and to firing modulation becoming standard on many units.” He emphasizes that with the use of condensing boilers, the reduction can be even more dramatic. “We have seen up to a 50% reduction in energy use in systems that make proper use of outdoor reset schedules, aggressive night/weekend setback schemes and larger system temperature differentials.”
Combine Condensing with Non-Condensing
Wedal discusses the paybacks available with boiler replacement. “This will depend on the quantity and type of boilers replaced. We have seen typical payback times to be around five years.” However, he explains that with the design of hybrid boiler plants – condensing and modern non-condensing boilers together – payback times sometimes drop to as low as two years. “The smaller initial investment can still return near the same energy reduction, so the payback is shorter and the ROI is higher.”
Wedal cautions that not all applications are suitable for a condensing hydronic boiler. “While a condensing boiler can be used to replace almost any boiler or be used in new applications, there is a cost premium to manufacture a boiler that can withstand the effects of the acid condensate formed during the condensing action. If an application will never see return water temperatures low enough to cause condensing in the boiler, a better choice would be to use a near-condensing boiler. At return water temperatures at or above 140° F, the condensing boiler and the near-condensing boiler will have approximately the same efficiency but the latter will have a lower initial cost.”
Reduce Overall Energy Use
According to Erin Sperry, Commercial Heating Product Manager from Fulton Boilers, their product is also growing in popularity and this is influenced by commercial and industrial applications with budget constraints in a competitive economy. “Using condensing boilers provides opportunities not only to increase thermal efficiencies of the boiler plant, but to decrease overall energy use.”
Sperry notes that the Fulton Pulse boilers were the first commercially sized condensing boiler available in North America. “The Fulton Pulse and Vantage boilers are designed to be rugged, robust and reliable. Pressure vessel designs feature high product mass and higher water volume.” This is a benefit because high volume pressure vessels experience less cycling and have greater tolerance of varying flow and/or no-flow conditions.
Take Advantage of Condensing Feature
Sperry points out that most condensing boilers have a high temperature limit around 210° F. For this reason, she says, higher temperature applications are not appropriate. “Further, systems should be designed to take advantage of the high efficiencies at which condensing boilers are capable of operating.”
Multiple Units with Modulation
Sperry points out, “It is very common to use multiple boilers in condensing applications. Multiple boilers with modulation (turndown) capabilities facilitate better overall system load matching.” As mentioned earlier, condensing boilers have high thermal efficiencies even at lower firing rates. Sperry continues, “Thus it is important to have a sophisticated boiler sequencing system that keeps multiple boilers on at their lowest proper firing rates.”
Old Boiler Replacement Saves 60%
Greg Hughes from Thermal Solutions, another prominent condensing boiler manufacturer, echoes the multiple unit advantage. “By installing smaller and multiple condensing boilers, owners are able to stage the boilers depending on the heating load, which will help in fuel savings compared to one larger boiler.” He adds, “Another benefit of multiple units is in housing complexes or military bases that have eliminated a central boiler plant. They are now installing multiple boilers to better control heat where it is needed and to save on fuel and electricity.”
The Thermal Solutions condensing boiler product features a ceramic radiant burner design along with their TSBC advanced control system. Hughes says, “This gives our EVCA condensing boiler the ability to achieve and sustain the higher efficiencies our customers are looking for in a condensing boiler.”
Not all boiler replacement projects will result in high levels of savings, but for the right application, a condensing boiler system can yield significant energy savings, reduced plant emissions, and rapid response to changing heating load conditions. If your hydronic operation fits the temperature regimes for condensing boilers, it is certainly worth making that investigation.
The Energy Solutions Center is a non-profit organization comprised of 50 energy utilities that work together to bring new, energy efficient, natural gas solutions to commercial and industrial energy users.
Energy Solutions Center websites
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.