Five reasons to practice dust control
Industrial vacuum cleaners help mitigate environmental hazards, OSHA violations
Sweeping or blowing of fugitive dust during housekeeping is widely discouraged by OSHA and the NFPA for nearly all industries. Seemingly benign, dusts create an assortment of hazards that include flying particles that can lead to eye injury, slip hazards and ergonomic injuries. The most serious hazards surrounding the sweeping and blowing of dust threaten lives, such as respiratory and explosion hazards.
The use of vacuums to remove dust is almost always recommended as a preferred method of removing fugitive dust. Rather than redistributing dust, industrial vacuum cleaners remove dusts and therefore reduce or eliminate the previously mentioned hazards.
Certainly, the most dramatic hazard associated with dust is secondary explosion. So dramatic that it captured the attention of congress which led to bill that directed OSHA to “issue an interim combustible dust rule and an amendment to the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) in 90 days, and a final rule in 18 months,” according to OSHA’s Combustible Dust; Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
With over 4,900 violations associated with OSHA’s Combustible Dust National Emphasis Program (NEP), the recent news releases about the organization leveling fines at four companies ranging from $63,000 to $137,000 just this year, and increasing local television coverage of combustible dust violations, it should now be clear that OSHA is serious about enforcing current standards.
In response to OSHA’s NEP, many facility and safety managers have revamped their housekeeping practices and added industrial vacuum cleaners approved for use in Class II Div II areas to mitigate the possibility of secondary explosions caused by fugitive dust.
However, of the over 1000 inspections that OSHA has completed, only 18 to 22 percent of the facilities were in compliance with OSHA requirements.
“It can sometimes be tough for facilities,” said David Kennedy, GM for VAC-U-MAX’s vacuum cleaning division. “They may have gotten approval from the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) but OSHA can still come in and fine them if they deem that the facility doesn’t meet up to combustible dust standards.”
Although it can be argued that current OSHA standards are ambiguous, hence OSHA’s proposed rulemaking on combustible dust, the standards, however daunting to sift through, are clearly noted in OSHA’s Safety and Health Information Bulletin entitled Combustible Dust in Industry: Preventing and Mitigating the Effects of Fire and Explosions that was first issued 5 years ago.
According to the Status report, housekeeping ranked second in citations under the NEP “with respect to combustible dust related hazards.” In addition to accumulations of combustible dust being prevalent among the violations, blowing dust with an air compressor, and not using electrical equipment that was designed for hazardous (classified) locations were also among the top violations related to combustible dust related hazards.
“There is no single standard, or one vacuum cleaner that can meet the requirements for all combustible dust,” said Kennedy. “Companies really need someone who has intimate knowledge of how chemicals react in certain environments and is experienced in NFPA standards to help them choose the right Class II Div 2 vacuum cleaner.”
Although, OSHA’s 1910.22 has no specific wording that specifically address fugitive dust, the status report states, “housekeeping standard at 29 C.F.R. 1910.22 not only applies to typical housekeeping hazards but also applies to dust accumulation hazards.”
There are other OSHA standards such as Dust Control Handbook For Minerals Processing and OSHA’s Grain Handling Facilities Standard or the Mine Safety and Health Act regulations for coal mines that do address fugitive dust and suggest that operations “eliminate the use of compressed air jets to clean accumulated dust from the equipment or clothing and substitute a vacuum cleaning system” and “use a vacuum cleaning system to clean spills and dust accumulations. Avoid brooms and shovels.”
In addition, most NFPA standards referenced in the combustible dust SHIP recommend vacuum cleaning as the preferred first defense method for controlling fugitive dust. NFPA 654 126.96.36.199 states, “vigorous sweeping or blowing down with steam or compressed air produces dust clouds and shall be permitted only where the following requirements are met: (1) Area and equipment shall be vacuumed prior to blow-down.”
Further reading of the standard reads “vigorous sweeping or blowing down with steam or compressed air should only take place after the area or equipment has been vacuumed due to the creation of dust clouds by the other methods.
With so many standards advocating the use of vacuum cleaners in the housekeeping process, one might be surprised to find so few being used in facilities. Especially since the first air operated industrial vacuum cleaner was developed in 1954 specifically to prevent dust explosions in textile mills.
However, when most people think of vacuum cleaners in an industrial setting, they often think of shop-type vacuums that they have in their garages. Sometimes facilities have attempted to employ those types of vacs and find that they not only create sparking hazards, but that are ineffective at sucking up fine dust particles or heavy materials, and often create their own dust clouds when operating.
Those shop type vacuums are no comparison to Industrial vacuum cleaners that have 5 times the suction power than commercial or personal use shop-type vacuums.
Air powered industrial vacuum cleaners that meet NFPA 70 requirements for grounding and bonding, also meet the definition of an “intrinsically-safe system” because they do not use electricity and do not generate any heat from operation.
Implementing industrial vacuum cleaners is one of the most cost effective methods to handle fugitive dust and avoid some of the most cited OSHA violations regarding combustible dust and to protect facilities from catastrophic dust explosions.
The three most recent dust explosions in 2010, two outside the U.S. and one in Douglas County, OR that all tolled killed 19 people and injured 53, serve as a reminder that secondary dust explosions are more destructive than primary explosions. The reason for this is increased concentrations of dispersed combustible dust that is activated from the initial explosion.
Beyond creating dust clouds that, have the potential to ignite, sweeping or blowing dust during housekeeping routines causes powders to become suspended and settle in hard to reach areas to reach, including beams and walls or areas that are hidden behind equipment or in very small spaces that are difficult to reach during daily housekeeping routines
The accumulation of combustible dust in areas such as this are among some of the most cited violations by OSHA. The use of industrial vacuum cleaners designed for use in Class II Div II environments, not only remove dust particles as small 1 micron, but when used regularly in housekeeping routines minimizes the amount of dust that can collect in hard to reach areas. Reducing the amount of dust that is suspended in the air leads to lower housekeeping costs because fewer man-hours are required for the task.
“The business of working with powders is fascinating,” said Kennedy. “We work with so many different chemicals that have such wide-ranging reactions--it never gets boring. Some chemicals don’t get wet with water; in fact, they can even become more flammable when exposed to water. We are working on an application right now that is a waste product of three different chemicals. There is no name for this chemical, but we are helping our client deal with the explosive nature of this waste.”
Reducing the amount of combustible powder that is suspended in the air, by using industrial vacuum cleaners, not only mitigates the possibility for dust explosions, but can also lead to a better respiratory environment for workers, reduce slip hazards and even prevent back injuries caused by cleaning heavy dusts.
Respiratory, Slip and Ergonomic Hazards
“Some powders, such as silica, when blown with air compressors have the ability to hang in the air for days,” said Kennedy. “Others, such as graphite, are slippery; and, some are very heavy, like cement that can weigh 50 to 70 pounds per cubic foot and can cause back injuries when sweeping them.”
When dusts hang in the air for longer periods, they can exacerbate respiratory threats. Silica exposure can lead to silicosis, a lung disease caused by continued inhalation of siliceous minerals that are prevalent in glass, brick, cement, asphalt, ceramic, and metal fabrication industries where sand is used as a component or for blasting, as well as in tunneling operations.
“Silica, of course, is only one of the powders that pose respiratory threats to workers,” said Kennedy. “To combat those, we can provide a second HEPA filter rated 99.97% on particle size to 0.3 microns.”
Since OSHA is taking strong enforcement actions to address combustible dust hazards, facilities must make reasonable efforts to mitigate combustible dust hazards. To assist companies in understanding OSHA requirements, VAC-U-MAX has developed a website, www.combustibledustvacs.com, dedicated to combustible dust hazards, including OSHA documents referencing the hazards and compliance.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.