EISA’s impact on manufacturers, energy, and dust collection
Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). This law requires that all general purpose, three-phase AC industrial motors from 1 to 500 horsepower that are manufactured for sale in the United States Dec. 19, 2010 and later will need to meet mandated efficiency standards. Are you ready? (See tables.)
By Joe Kiolbasa, Donaldson Company, Inc.
Motor-driven equipment accounts for 64% of the electricity consumed by U.S. industries, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Converting these motors to more energy efficient models can reduce this energy consumption by as much as 12%. (See tables, below.)
In an effort to reduce energy demands, reduce the need to build new power plants and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA). This law requires that all general purpose, three-phase AC industrial motors from 1 to 500 horsepower that are manufactured for sale in the United States Dec. 19, 2010 and later will need to meet mandated efficiency standards.
For plant managers, engineers and maintenance managers, this means that they will have a whole new set of variables to consider when deciding how to power fans that are required to draw dusty air through their dust collectors.
Government mandated energy efficiency levels for motors are not really new. The U.S. Government required it in 1997 when it implemented the Energy Policy Act, which also required minimum efficiency levels for motors. Since then, motor manufacturers have continued to make enhancements to motors that make them even more energy efficient. Because of this, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association developed a new standard for motor efficiency which NEMA trademarked as NEMA Premium Efficient. It is this standard that EISA refers to when it states that new motors must meet mandated efficiency standards.
Premium efficient motors
To understand how the electrical efficiency of a motor can be improved, one needs to know how it loses energy. First of all, an electric motor could be considered a transformer of energy. It converts electrical energy into mechanical energy. Efficiency is a measurement of how much energy a motor uses in relationship to the rated power delivered to the shaft.
An electric motor loses efficiency several different ways, but the largest amount of loss comes from power losses caused by the resistance of electricity to flow through the motor. This resistance not only loses power, but it also generates heat. To reduce resistance, premium efficient motors contain about 20% more copper than standard efficiency motors.
This means that in addition to saving energy, premium efficient motors will generate less heat, which is a benefit if the motor is working in an air conditioned environment. Less heat also means less wear and tear on the motor, so premium efficient motors generally last longer than standard efficiency motors.
Another way an electric motor loses efficiency is via slip losses. Slip is the difference in rpm between the rotational speed of the magnetic field and the actual rpm of the shaft. To reduce this slip, premium efficient motors have greater mass and conductivity in their rotor conductors.
Existing vs. new motors
Companies are not required to replace existing motors with EISA-compliant motors. A motor can be repaired or even rebuilt instead of buying a new EISA compliant motor that may be slightly more expensive. But is rebuilding a good idea? Assuming a plant runs its dust collector 16 hours per day, five days a week, column A of the table below shows how much energy it will consume annually with a motor manufactured before 1997. By contrast, column B shows how much energy a plant will consume using an EISA compliant motor. These calculations are based on industrial electrical costs of 10.7 cents per kilowatt hour, which was the national average in July of 2010.
The amount of energy saved is dependent upon the size of the motor. The 5 hp motor only saves $113 per year, while the 50 hp motor saves $710 per year. Assuming a plant uses these motors for 20 years, its lifetime savings are $2,266 versus $14,204.
Even though the federal government is mandating that all new motors manufactured meet the NEMA Premium Efficient standards, some electrical utilities still offer rebates to incent companies to replace their functional but less efficient motors with NEMA Premium Efficient motors. For example Xcel Energy (covering states in the upper Midwest and West) offers a prescriptive rebate for 2010 of $300 for 5 hp motors and a $1,500 rebate for 50 hp motors, so companies should make sure they check with their local electric power supplier to see if they qualify for rebates.
Dust collection impact
A company that buys a new dust collector with fan and motor in January of 2011 or later will find that it comes with a motor that meets EISA and will be considered NEMA Premium Efficient.
Using an EISA compliant motor on a dust collector can reduce a plant’s annual energy consumption, but there are certain things that plant leaders can do to maximize their energy savings. The first thing plant leaders can do is control their motor and fan speed with a variable frequency drive. A VFD can adjust the rotational speed of a motor, and thus a fan, by controlling the frequency of the electrical power supplied to the motor. Using one of these devices can save significant amounts of energy in a dust collector.
To maximize savings, a plant should use filters that are designed to keep the dust on the outer surface of the filters (surface loading filters vs standard depth loading filters). Studies have shown that these filters stay cleaner longer because it is easier to pulse the dust off of these filters during the cleaning phase of the dust collector.
Because of this, less static pressure is required to suck air through many of these filters meaning they may require as much as 2 inches less static pressure. If a plant combines these filters in the collector with a VFD on the fan and motor combination, the energy savings can really begin to stack up.
Costs and benefits
A VFD for a 5 hp motor can cost up to $3,900, while a VFD for a 50 HP can cost as much as $7,500. Electrical utilities understand how much electricity can be saved by using VFDs, so many utilities offer substantial rebates on this purchase. Xcel Energy, as an example, is currently offering rebates of $600 for a 5 hp VFD and $3,500 on a 50 hp VFD. So even though a VFD for a 50 hp motor costs $7,500, the final cost will be $4,000 after rebate. Then if a plant uses surface loading filters that require 2 inches less static pressure, it will be saving $5,661 in energy costs annually, which means that the VFD will pay for itself in energy savings in less than a year. Not only that, but over the 20-year life of this motor, a plant will save over $113,225.
It bears repeating that premium efficient motors are more efficient because they incur fewer slip losses. While that higher efficiency is the name of the game, plants should know that a premium efficient motor may run at a higher RPM, which could result in a reduction of energy savings or in some cases increase energy consumption. A VFD will protect against this issue and produce the energy savings plants seek by helping to keep the airflow constant.
By combining various dust collection strategies with the new federally mandated EISA compliant motors, a company can save significant amounts of money through electrical consumption savings.
Joe Kiolbasa is a Torit Product Manager at Donaldson Company, Inc P.O. Box 1299, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1299; (952) 703-4877 (joe.kiolbasa(at)donaldson.com) He holds a BA in business from the University Of Minnesota Carlson School Of Management in Minneapolis, MN and has more than a decade of experience in industrial air filtration.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.