Economies of scales: Utilizing weighing technology to increase uptime, reduce error
Time is money; a philosophy that drives today’s industries to implement solutions that proactively promote factory floor efficiency and productivity, as downtime eats into revenue growth.
Time is money; a philosophy that drives today’s industries to implement solutions that proactively promote factory floor efficiency and productivity, as downtime eats into revenue growth. By utilizing equipment and technology that can evolve with and anticipate operational needs, operators can enhance productivity. Manufacturers achieve the precision required in dry processing operations, particularly ingredient mixing in batching and blending applications, by integrating intelligent, sophisticated weighing technology with plant machines and equipment.
Electronic scale systems, consisting of weight sensors and indictors, are designed to increase automation in dry processing applications. With advanced integration capabilities, automated electronic scale systems interface with plant devices and communicate with PLCs, PCs, and other vital operating systems to provide an automated weighing solution. System automation effectively decreases dependence on manual monitoring, manipulation, and operation, minimizing human error.
While automating weighing processes provides manufacturers with greater control and visibility over the entire manufacturing enterprise, it also provides benefits beyond measurement accuracy. By applying this technology to complex blending and batching applications, users can experience improved quality control, increased inventory management, and reduced labor.
A weight sensor, or load cell, is a steel structure with strain gauges, or electronic sensors, positioned on the outside surfaces—two sensors on the top and two on the bottom. As with most load cells, this structure acts as a cantilever, unsupported on one end and fixed on the other.
When a load is applied on the unsupported end, the sensors detect strain in the structure and provide an analog mV/V output. This output is interpreted by indicator electronics, and the weight indicator digitally displays the strain as the load’s weight.
For dry processing, electronic weight sensors are placed under each leg of a material container. As weight is placed into a container, the electrical current running through each weight sensor is changed, and this altered current is brought to and combined at a junction box.
From here, the collected data is sent via interface cable to a scale indicator, which converts the current to a digital weight display. Once affixed to a bin, tank, or hopper, weight sensors can transform these traditional containers into highly accurate, in-line scale solutions.
As an ingredient is dispensed into the container, it causes the suspended end of the weight sensor to deflect slightly as it absorbs the force of the load. The force measurement is then translated as the ingredient’s weight. As subsequent ingredients are added, the weight sensor deflects an appreciable amount from its current position to represent the new ingredient’s weight.
The suspended end of the load cell then returns to its initial position once the container is emptied. Adding to this design, some weight sensors have two pairs of electronic sensors—also called strain gauges—located on the outside of the weight sensor structure, one pair on top and one on the bottom. This sensor arrangement helps ensure uniform compressive strain throughout the structure, which eliminates the effects of end loading, side loading, and torsion.
Indicators are the brain of the weighing operation, collecting and communicating data throughout the manufacturing enterprise for process control that serves to improve accuracy as well as provide revenue optimization. For instance, data collected can be transferred via the indicator’s connectivity options, communicating information through intranet or Internet to allow operators to monitor and control operations from a PC anywhere in the world.
Indicators are also multitaskers, with some capable of simultaneously monitoring several independent scales as well as directly controlling automated weight-based operations. To facilitate at-a-glance decipherability, indicators employ a combination of text and graphics that clearly convey process status and product weights. This reduces read errors and allows operators to quickly take action if a process becomes obstructed or products do not meet weight regulations.
For instance, horizontal bar graphs can display over/under readings in checkweighing operations, vertical bar graphs display ingredient amounts, and pie graphs track rapid fill operations.
In dry processing applications, scale indicators can be programmed to control filling and batching applications through monitoring bins or hoppers—observing each operation until the designated container meets a user-programmed setpoint. This proves useful for ingredient mixing, as the indicator can be programmed to shut down each hopper after it releases its designated ingredient amount—ensuring the appropriate ingredient mix is achieved every time.
Weighing system in action
For ingredient measurement in blending applications, using weight sensors and indicators together can automate these applications for improved accuracy and product consistency. Weight sensors are placed on each leg of the material container to capture readings. Coupling sensor technology with an indicator that stores recipe components ensures the exact amount of each ingredient is dispensed, without requiring operator intervention.
Once the measurement parameters have been entered into the indicator—usually consisting of weight ingredients and timed events—the automated weighing systems can be configured to recall recipes, automatically measuring according to the specified weight values or percentages. When the first ingredient is dispensed, the indicator monitors the weight sensor to identify when the first setpoint—the amount of the first ingredient required—is met. The indicator’s first output is then used to communicate this message to the dispensing equipment’s control system. The first ingredient valve is then closed, and the second ingredient is dispensed.
Further, these automated scale systems can accommodate rapid product switchover, controlling multiple weighing requirements in a single application while delivering high-quality results. For additional automation, indicators can be configured to track product usage, keeping a running total for inventory purposes—maximizing process efficiency and reducing inaccuracies due to operator error.
Indicators can also improve filling operations by preventing common measuring miscalculations, such as freefall error. As common sense dictates, though the indicator will send a stop signal to the dispensing equipment, there will likely still be material that is caught in mid-dispense mode. This causes the total amount of ingredient added to exceed the setpoint, a condition known as freefall error.
However, using weight indicators that work in real time can solve this challenge. By calculating the future net weight of the added ingredient instantaneously, it can determine the rate of flight during filling. The indicator identifies when freefall error will likely occur and adjusts the filling time accordingly.
Benefits of automated batching and blending
Using a system that automatically tracks material disbursement and usage enables operators to increase inventory control, product quality, and customer satisfaction, all while decreasing labor and production costs. Automated electronic scale systems offer unmatched reliability with greater process visibility and control to minimize the effects of human error—saving money, time, and labor.
Blending and batching applications rely on precision measurements, and often these products directly affect daily lives, such as pharmaceutical and food processing. Minute changes in measurements could have large impacts on product quality and customer satisfaction. Utilizing indicators with checkweighing features enables manufacturers to perform frequent quality checks, while eliminating the need for a separate checkweigher and manual supervision. By simply entering upper and lower weight limits or using sample mode, indicators can be configured to perform standard deviation or deliver X Bar R statistical data, ensuring customers receive the correct value for their investment and manufacturers are not losing revenue from inaccurate measuring.
Using a scale system with advanced data logging and communication capabilities provides real-time product inventory updates. Indicators can track and monitor product usage or remaining amounts, communicating this information to office computers, signaling when product inventory is low and reordering is necessary. For example, indicators can be programmed to measure the weight of a tank after each time the product is dispensed, repeatedly calculating the amount left. The indicator automatically totals product usage and eliminates risks of shortage and surplus concerns.
Reduced labor cost
By providing easy and effective integration with manufacturing equipment and communication devices, operators can minimize manual operation or interference. This allows the scale system to perform many functions that would often require an operator to complete, simultaneously increasing accuracy and reducing labor costs.
By utilizing innovative weighing technology to automate batching and filling applications, weighing inaccuracies and humor error are minimized while uptime is maximized, allowing operators to realize their “time is money” philosophy with improved productivity and profitability.
As product manager at Avery Weigh-Tronix, Don Halbert has more than 33 years of expertise in the provision of weighing equipment and solutions. He focuses on the need for weight-based data collection in a variety of industries, including warehousing, recycling, transportation, waste, and food and beverage.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.