Counterfeit safety certifications discovered
Exida has found bogus certificates claiming devices are SIL-3 capable under IEC61508.
Counterfeit industrial equipment is a growing problem as unscrupulous manufacturers seek to cut costs while sacrificing quality and safety. In the same vein, exida, a test lab and certifier of automation equipment for use in safety instrumented systems, has discovered counterfeit certificates claiming exida certification to Safety Integrity Level (SIL) 3 capability of IEC 61508.
The company advises safety practitioners to consult the Safety Automation Equipment List (SAEL) to verify certification validity. The SAEL is a comprehensive directory of safety certified equipment assessed by accredited by a variety of certification bodies such as exida, TÜV Rheinland, TÜV Süd, and TÜV Nord.
Authentic certification helps process manufacturers design and implement safety instrumented systems that comply with the IEC 61511/ISA 84 functional safety standard, as required by law in some areas of the world. Authentic certification indicates that the product hardware and software design, the safety manual, as well as the processes used for development, testing, and quality control, comply with the requirements of the IEC 61508 international standard.
Visit the Control Engineering Safety and Security Channel.
Edited by Peter Welander, email@example.com
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.