Cost savings opportunities in machine safety
Machine safety shifted in 2002 with the changes in NFPA 79 introducing safety PLCs and safety communication and control bus technology as solutions allowed for machine guarding, the beginning of a major paradigm shift in machine safety. See savings tally.
Machine safety entered an era of major paradigm shift in 2002 with the changes in NFPA 79 introducing safety PLCs and safety communication and control bus technology as solutions allowed for machine guarding. This change offered choices in safety automation the same as those choices offered in the early 1970’s when PLC’s were introduced for general automation. Now, safety automation can be an integral part of general automation by choice if the application opportunity is ripe with similar drivers as was the application opportunity for general automation.
Safety Automation drivers today can be up to:
1.) 80% reduction in typical components
2.) 40% reduction in engineering
3.) 30% reduction in check-out time
4.) 20% reduction in required floor space
5.) 5% to 15% increase in productivity
In my opinion, as you look at your current machine safety solutions and machine safety culture, you might also want to look at the above drivers where some companies have been the early adopters of safety automation and achieved these results. And, while you’re at it, also ask yourself if your machine guarding solutions would be considered “best-in–class”?
In this competitive environment don’t you need to look at metrics like sustainability, competitive analysis, profit, and the like in order to drive your business to a competitive advantage? After looking at these drivers isn’t it hard to look the other way?
Don’t you agree?
Let’s hear your ideas?
Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Cost Savings Opportunities in Machine Safety
Did you see the Safety Integration Webcast?
Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.