Cement producers and the EPA
You may have noticed recent announcements that cement producers will soon have to restrict emissions of mercury and other pollutants. New EPA regulations require that by 2013, cement producers collectively will reduce mercury and particulates by 92%, acid gasses by 97%, and sulfur dioxide by 78%.
This has a familiar ring to it, and it took me back to an earlier life where I paid a lot of attention to the cement industry. I worked for a company that manufactures spray nozzles that are used to cool flue gasses. If the gas coming out of your process is hotter than you want it to be, and there is no practical way to capture and reuse the heat, you can cool it by spraying in finely atomized water. The concept is simple but doing it effectively is harder than you might think.
Back in 1999, I presented a paper at the Cement Conference on EPA regulations that were coming into effect in 2000. One of rep organizations that sells the equipment still hosts the paper if you’re interested. Back then the EPA was concerned more with toxic gas formation (dioxins and furans) but it also wanted to restrict particulates and mercury for hazardous waste burning kilns. The point then and now is that proven and practical technologies exist to manage these emissions. SOx, NOx, mercury, acid gasses, toxic gasses, and heavy metals can all be controlled. (Carbon dioxide is another matter. A cement or lime kiln produces carbon dioxide because it’s part of the calcining process, regardless of the fuel used.)
Some plants may not want to add control technologies it because it will add cost. For better or worse, the cement industry managed to stay under the environmental radar for a long time, but regulations are beginning to catch up. Now as it implements new controls, production will shift around. Plants that can work with the new regulations without much trouble will benefit. Others will likely close and the balance of imports vs. domestic production may change. This isn’t the first industry to have to face such a displacement, nor will it be the last. Life will go on.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.