Best practices for testing steam traps
When it comes to testing steam traps, deciding which method to use can be confusing. This article offers an introduction to the primary testing technologies--visual, temperature-based, and ultrasonic--and best practices on how and when to use them.
When it comes to testing steam traps, a frequently asked question is, “What is the best method?” The true answer is to use all of the technologies available today. No single test method provides the best results all of the time for the variety of steam traps in the marketplace.
Therefore, all tools available in the marketplace should be implemented and used where appropriate.
So, what are these tools? They can be segmented into three categories:
Becoming proficient with these tools is like riding a bicycle – the more you ride the bicycle,
the better you become. Practice and gaining the knowledge of the methods is the key to successfully using the different devices.
1. Visual Methods
The use of a testing-tee valve arrangement, testing-valve combination, or an inline sight glass for reviewing the steam trap discharging to the atmosphere is a very effective way of testing steam traps. This visual method can accurately determine the following conditions:
- Blow-through steam or a failed open condition
- Severe steam leakage
- Under sizing
There are some negatives to any testing method and the visual method is no exception. The inspector must understand the concept of flash steam and become aware of the difference between flash steam and blow-through steam. Also, there are safety concerns due to the release of hot steam to atmosphere during the testing phase. Finally, there is a small additional cost associated with installing the components that permit online testing.
2. Temperature Testing Equipment
Temperature measurement equipment must be an integral part of a steam system testing program. It is by no means the only piece of equipment that should be utilized, but can help provide information that would otherwise not be available. Understanding the limitation and capabilities of your temperature measurement equipment will only enhance its usefulness. The pressure/temperature relationship of steam makes temperature measurement extremely helpful in establishing existing steam system pressures.
Infrared testing devices will detect the temperature of the steam line ahead of the trap and at the discharge of the steam trap, but it is only estimating the existing steam pressure. The testing person must be knowledgeable of steam pressures before and condensate line pressures after the steam trap to understand the steam trap performance. The inlet temperature provides insight into the saturated steam pressure at the inlet of the steam trap. The outlet temperature of the steam trap will correspond to the condensate return line pressure or back pressure existing in the condensate line.
At best, results using temperature indication is accurate only about 44% of the time. Low steam pressure systems are practically impossible to test using temperature methods. The primary role of infrared devices is to provide a surface temperature during the testing procedure and therefore a pressure reading at any point in the system.
Types of Temperature Measurement Devices
Basically, there are two types of temperature measuring devices on the market today:
Contact Temperature Devices
Contact temperature measuring devices require time for the temperature at the point of contact to reach the same temperature as the object being tested. Depending on the surface conditions, this may not be an acceptable method of temperature measurement.
When measuring surface temperature of solid materials, the area where the readings will be taken may need some surface preparation. For instance, large build-up of residue on a surface will cause the reading to be lower than the actual surface temperature. One other factor that may affect the accuracy of the reading will be the integrity of the contact point on the device.
Non-Contact Temperature Devices
Non-contact temperature devices measure the surface temperature of a given piece of an object utilizing radiated infrared energy. Infrared devices provide an instantaneous temperature measurement, typically without any surface preparation. However, for highly reflective surfaces, the surface should be prepared such that the infrared energy can be absorbed and detected by the instrument.
Infrared energy is sensed by optics/lenses that are sensitive to the non-visible portion of the light wave band. These types of devices provide varying degrees of accuracy depending on the following criteria:
- Quality of optics
- Spot or target diameter
- Emissivity compensation for varying surface emissivity
- Ambient temperature
The best results are obtained when a few basic concepts about infrared heat radiation are understood. All objects radiate infrared energy to some degree. This energy radiates in all directions, much like light from a light bulb. The infrared thermometer has a lens that collects the radiated energy and focuses it on an infrared detector. The detector responds by producing a voltage signal, which is proportional to the amount of energy received. This voltage signal is correlated to a given temperature, which is displayed on a meter or LED display.
It is important to realize that not all infrared temperature measurement equipment is created equal. The main variable that affects how well a unit will work for a given application is its ability to adjust for different emissivity.
What Is Emissivity?
Some objects reflect infrared energy as well as radiate it. Shiny or highly polished surfaces will reflect more infrared energy than dull surfaces. A factor called emissivity is the ratio of radiated energy of an object compared to radiation of a black body. The higher the emissivity numbers, the smaller the portion of heat energy reflected and the more accurate the reading. Infrared sensors are accurate for emitted energy. Reflected energy requires adjustment.
Infrared rays follow the same laws as visible light. Some of the light will be absorbed on a given surface and part of it will be reflected. Black is the optimum color that absorbs light, so we can assume that there will be no reflected infrared energy. The use of the term emissivity is an attempt to give some idea as to what portion of the infrared is reflected and how much is radiated. Emissivity will be noted as a number between 0.0 and 1.0.
Most surfaces encountered in the steam world will have an emissivity between 0.8 and 1.0. This range of emissivity has little reflected energy – no more than a one-degree difference in readings. When selecting infrared scanning equipment, it is necessary to decide the degree of accuracy needed and then select equipment accordingly.
Checking for Unknown Emissivity
Some infrared temperature measurement devices have features that enable you to adjust emissivity. Charts that accompany such units guide the user with selection for a given surface. Equipment without this feature can be used for measurement of objects with varying emissivity, by using a simple method of manual control.
3. Ultrasonic Testing Equipment
Ultrasonic testing equipment provides the most versatile and accurate steam system diagnostics available today. The ultrasonic unit allows the operator to hear sounds undetectable to the human ear. This type of equipment receives a high frequency signal (typically between 20 – 100 KHz) and heterodynes the signal, providing an audible sound for the operator to hear with the aid of headphones. Typical applications for performance testing include the following components:
- Steam traps
- Steam leaks
- Heat exchangers
- Steam valves
Ultrasonic steam trap testing is the final test method to be used in the steam trap testing program for detecting faulty steam traps. The operator utilizes the stethoscope module to contact the discharge side of the steam trap, and has the ability to sense and detect even subtle changes in operational characteristics or malfunctions.
The sensitivity of most high frequency monitoring equipment allows the testing person to hear not only completely failed steam traps (blowing steam), but even leaking steam from a steam trap in operation. This test method provides the earliest signal of steam trap wear and is used as a predictive tool for steam trap monitoring.
Ultrasonic testing permits the testing person to hear the internal operation of the steam trap, so the effectiveness of the steam trap operation can be determined.
Standard Operating Procedure for Testing Steam Traps
The steam trap must be visually inspected for the following conditions:
- Proper installation
- Proper flow
- Trapset components in place
- Type of steam trap
- On/off or continuous flow
- Collect necessary information for input into the trap database
- Trap ID number
Temperature measurements must be taken upstream and downstream to determine the inlet steam pressure and the condensate line back pressure. Temperature differential across the steam trap is calculated once the inlet and outlet pressures are determined. There is no single correct temperature differential across a steam trap that verifies a properly operating steam trap or a steam trap that has failed.
- Inlet temperature - steam/condensate line to the inlet steam trap
- The temperature to the inlet of the steam consumer (equipment) should be measured and compared to the inlet of the steam trap. These temperatures should be close in temperature measurement (± 20° F)
- Outlet temperature - condensate line downstream of the steam trap
- Determine the back pressure that is present in the condensate line.
3. Ultrasound Testing
Sensitivity settings for ultrasound (scale = 0 – 100%):
- 0 – 20 psi = 92% or higher
- 20 – 150 psi = 80% to 85%
- 150 – 300 psi = 74% to 78%
- 300 – 600 psi = 60% to 65%
- 600 psi or higher = comparison method
Selecting Testing Procedure
Testing steam traps is simplified when the manufacturer classifies the steam traps as follows:
- On/off operation
- Continuous flow
When testing a steam trap and the testing person is not sure of the steam trap performance, then a comparison method should be used. The comparison method is accomplished by taking three individual ultrasonic readings:
- Discharge side of the steam trap orifice
See the figure below for a recommendation on the spots to choose.
Place the stethoscope at the discharge side of the orifice in the steam trap. The highest level ultrasound is generated at this point. Pull the ultrasound trigger and then take the measurements.
Testing steam traps can be very easy if the plant provides the correct equipment, training, and commitment to a steam system management program.
For more information, visit www.swagelokenergy.com.
The above material is part of Swagelok Energy Advisors' series of Best Practice papers, authored by Kelly Paffel. Kelly is a recognized authority in steam and condensate systems. He is a frequent lecturer and instructor on the technical aspects of steam systems. In addition, Kelly has published many papers on the topics of steam system design and operation. Over the past 30 years, he has conducted thousands of steam system audits and training sessions in the United States and overseas, which has made Kelly an expert in trouble-shooting actual and potential problems in the utilities of steam. Kelly is a member of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Steam Best Practices and Steam Training Committees.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.