AEC M&A activity: 2012 first six months in review

Domestic M&A activity rebounds to 2011 pace; Domestic M&A activity clustered in key 12 states; Canadian AEC M&A market continues to sizzle; Domestic inter-state M&A activity remains at defensive levels; U.S. buyers continue to look to international growth; Publicly-traded firms still keeping power dry

07/23/2012


Graph 1: Domestic M&A activity, Source: Morrissey GoodaleDomestic M&A activity rebounds to 2011 pace: Domestic M&A activity rebounded in the second quarter, bringing the pace for the first half of the year in line with the prior years (Graph 1). However, the 88 deals announced in the U.S. through the end of June essentially reflect a pace of consolidation that is stuck at 2009 levels— which was the lowest point on record. This should cause concern about the strength of the economic recovery in the industry.

The big question is whether the momentum of Q2 (after a very slow Q1) will continue through the second half of the year. In large part that will be determined by how attractive the publicly-traded firms view the U.S. marketplace. As of late, the publics are tending to view overseas markets as relatively more attractive.

With six months to go in the year, we anticipate domestic M&A activity to be in the 175 to 195 deal range.

 

Graph 2: Top states for firm sales, Source: Morrissey GoodaleDomestic M&A activity clustered in key 12 states: Regionally, California and Texas registered the highest number of deals (nine in each state) for the first half of the year (Graph 2). Twelve states, including Texas and California represented almost 7 in 10 of all domestic deals during the first half of the year. Of note are the six deals in Florida— a sign that that market has likely hit and moved beyond the bottom.

 

 

 

 

Graph 3: Top international countries for firm sales, Source: Morrissey GoodaleCanadian AEC M&A market continues to sizzle: Although the Canadian AEC market is just 10% the size of that in the U.S., consolidation in Canada continued at a blistering pace during the first half of the year. We recorded twenty-three deals there through end of June (Graph 3). This torrid pace was driven in large part by the attractiveness of the booming energy sector and robust infrastructure markets in Western and Eastern Canada. Non-Canadian firms are lining up to get in on the action.

 

 

 

 

Graph 4: Interstate M&A activity, Source: Morrissey GoodaleDomestic inter-state M&A activity remains at defensive levels: For the first six months of the year, domestic inter-state deal-making activity remained in a relatively defensive posture with just 56% of deals occurring across state lines (Graph 4). This was down from 58% of domestic deals for the same period in 2011. We consider a pace of over 66% as representing a clear growth-oriented deal making environment.

 

 

 

 

 

Graph 5: Deal flow in and out of U.S., Source: Morrissey GoodaleU.S. buyers continue to look to international growth: The first half of the year saw U.S. buyers announce eleven overseas acquisitions on pace with last year— a distinctly higher number than prior years (Graph 5). This in indicative of what we continue to hear from the largest firms in the industry — that more and more they see overseas as yielding greater opportunities for growth until the U.S. Political and economic outlook has greater clarity.

Conversely, U.S. firm sales to international buyers continued their decline from the highs of 2007 and 2008. Just five U.S. firms sold to non-U.S. buyers in the first six months of the year continuing a downward trend. While overseas buyers still consider the U.S. market attractive, they too see their M&A priorities as being in the rich energy and natural resources markets of Canada, South America, MENA, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.

 

Graph 6: Percentage of domestic transactions involving a public , Source: Morrissey GoodalePublicly-traded firms still keeping power dry: Domestically, less than one in ten deals involved a publicly-traded buyer (Graph 6). This represents the lowest level of activity on the part of publics in the first half of the year since the dark days of 2009. 

Globally, publicly-traded firms were also “under-represented” compared to historical performance. Through the end of June, publics accounted for just over one-in-four deals, their most muted performance since the first half of 2007 (Graph 7).

Graph 7: Percentage of global transactions involving a public , Source: Morrissey Goodale 


 Morrissey GoodaleContent provided by Morrissey Goodale



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.