Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Standard benchmarks

Richard L. Dunn Editor -- Plant Engineering, 5/1/2002

Benchmarking has been around for many years, now. But it is still surrounded by many misunderstandings. One of the biggest is that it's about numbers. Of course, the metrics (numbers) are an important part of benchmarking, but they're only a part.

What benchmarking is really about is work processes. And the numbers are just convenient indicators of how well the processes may be working. Nevertheless, the metrics are inseparable from the processes and are often used to determine where real benchmarking is most likely to pay off.

During a meeting of plant engineers not long ago, our discussion turned to benchmarking. The question arose: Would it be possible to come up with a few essential benchmark metrics for plant engineering and maintenance that could be used universally throughout industry? We didn't have time to discuss the question much, but it has been haunting me since.

I personally think it is possible, but I'm equally sure it would take a group effort to decide on and define such benchmarks.

Here are some ground rules I would set for a group of essential benchmarks:

Taken together, they must relate plant engineering and/or maintenance performance to the business success of the plant or company.

They need to be clear, concise, and universal in their definitions so that they are truly comparable from plant to plant and industry to industry.

They should be easy for plant/company management to interpret and understand. Otherwise, they run the risk of widespread misuse.

And here are some of the areas where such benchmarks should be developed:

Safety: Safety just has to be at the top of every plant's list of priorities. It is both morally and fiscally sound.

Scheduling: No process can be optimized without effective scheduling.

Planning: Planned work is essential to top performance.

Operational productivity: Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) may or may not be the ultimate measure, but we need a standard method of some kind.

Cost: In the final set, there has to be at least one metric with dollar signs on it.

So there's the challenge. I'd like your input on how to meet it. Contact me at rdunn@cahners.com.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Photos

  • 2007 Product of the Year Winners
    This year's Plant Engineering Product of the Year winners were honored at the Manufacturing Summit in Chicago.
  • Top Plant: GEMA
    The game plan for GEMA (Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance) focuses on best-in-class execution
  • Top Plant: SEW Eurodrive
    SEW Eurodrive builds a culture based on employee empowerment and continuous improvement.
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Plant Engineering PlantMail!
Plant Engineering Hotwire
Plant Engineering Hotwire Automation
Plant Engineering Maintenance Connection
Plant Engineering Sustainable Manufacturing
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites