Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
FirstLight
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Do employees have to take vacation while on layoff?

By Raymond Dreyfack -- Plant Engineering, 1/1/2000

The plant was going full blast from April through December. January through March was the slack time of the year. During this period, a third of the work force was laid off.

When Maintenance Foreman Griff Masters posted a notice in May that vacations for selected personnel would be deferred until the 3-mo slack period, the crew raised a chorus of protest.

A committee of three headed by Electrician Grade II Bob Rankin appeared at Masters' desk. "This is a lousy deal," Rankin complained. Most people don't want to go on vacation during the winter. In my case, we always visit my wife's family in July. My wife would kill me."

"I sympathize with your problem," Masters replied, "but the job has to come first. We're loaded with work during the busy period. It makes good financial sense for the company to schedule vacations when employees can be spared. It makes sense for you too to stick around when you can pile up a lot of overtime."

The foreman's argument didn't impress the committee. When Masters refused to back down, Rankin promised to carry their case to a higher court.

Question: Can employees be forced to schedule their vacation for a time when they will be on layoff?

Stone's decision: "Kill the announcement," Plant Engineer Bert Stone instructed Masters. "While it's true that deferring vacations to the slack time of the year might be economically beneficial for the company, it would constitute a hardship for some employees.

"Vacation is intended as a time of rest and relaxation during work periods. The employee knows that following his vacation he will return to work in a refreshed and regenerated state of mind. When a person is on layoff he is understandably anxious and upset. The last thing he needs is a vacation. It is also generally conceded that in scheduling vacations the employee's personal preference must be taken into consideration. While this isn't always possible to the worker's complete satisfaction, it should not be ignored entirely."

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Bob Vavra
    Five Fast Things

    September 16, 2008
    What do the Chinese know, and what can we learn?
    1. Reaching across a great wall: Members of the Chinese Machine Tool and Tool Builders’ Associ...
    More
  • Bob Vavra
    Five Fast Things

    September 2, 2008
    Getting competitive on energy, getting tough on immigration
    1. One way to get competitive: We’ve highlighted the growing solar panel business around the U...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • 2007 Product of the Year Winners
    This year's Plant Engineering Product of the Year winners were honored at the Manufacturing Summit in Chicago.
  • Top Plant: GEMA
    The game plan for GEMA (Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance) focuses on best-in-class execution
  • Top Plant: SEW Eurodrive
    SEW Eurodrive builds a culture based on employee empowerment and continuous improvement.
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Plant Engineering PlantMail!
Plant Engineering Hotwire
Plant Engineering Hotwire Automation
Plant Engineering Maintenance Connection
Plant Engineering Sustainable Manufacturing
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites