Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
FirstLight
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Heard on the street...

By Staff -- Plant Engineering, 3/1/1999

(A collection of anonymous commentaries on outsourcing from plant engineers)

...One good reason for outsourcing is that it's easy to blame a contractor when something goes wrong. Of course, this may not work more than once with the same contractor. You have to be careful.

...When we outsourced part of our maintenance operation, the contractor promised to hire our people and leave them in the plant. They did for awhile. But after 2 yr, all our really good people had been reassigned and we were stuck with whoever they decided to send us.

...We noticed after awhile that one of our competitors seemed to know about stuff going on in our plant almost as soon as we did. We're pretty sure there was a leak through one of our contractors, although we could never prove it. Since then, we've beefed up security and have a pretty strict confidentiality agreement that every one of our contractors has to sign.

...We have a lot of production equipment we developed and maintained ourselves for a long time. Then we decided to outsource the machining of replacement parts. After that, we had nothing but trouble because our inhouse people had made modifications and improvements over the years that were never documented. I doubt that we'll ever save enough on the contract to make up for the lost production.

...I would never outsource security. That's like giving away the keys.

...Be careful what you ask for; you just might get it. One contractor we used provided exactly what we specified. Trouble was, we didn't know how to specify exactly what we wanted. We finally got it all worked out, but it took a long time before we completely understood each other.

...We contract for quite a few services that we just don't want to have to deal with ourselves. For example, we have a standing contract for all our scaffolding. I don't have to train anybody; I don't have to stock parts; I don't have to worry about it being put up right. All I have to do is make a phone call, and the job gets done quickly and safely.

...I get frustrated with people that think maintenance isn't a core competency. Our business is making [a product], and to do that, we also have to maintain and improve our equipment. Our plant is running beyond its design capacity without any problems. Now that's what I call return on investment, and it wouldn't happen without our own dedicated maintenance force. If that isn't a core competency, I don't know what is.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • 2007 Product of the Year Winners
    This year's Plant Engineering Product of the Year winners were honored at the Manufacturing Summit in Chicago.
  • Top Plant: GEMA
    The game plan for GEMA (Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance) focuses on best-in-class execution
  • Top Plant: SEW Eurodrive
    SEW Eurodrive builds a culture based on employee empowerment and continuous improvement.
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Plant Engineering PlantMail!
Plant Engineering Hotwire
Plant Engineering Hotwire Automation
Plant Engineering Maintenance Connection
Plant Engineering Sustainable Manufacturing
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites