Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Bad back: Can he refuse a lifting chore?

By Raymond Dreyfack -- Plant Engineering, 7/1/1998

Maintenance Foreman Foster Perkins wasn't entirely displeased when Utility Worker Vince Borelli refused an order to stack several 40-lb electrical units on a 5-ft-high shelf.

"My back's been acting up," Borelli explained. "This assignment could get me in trouble."

Perkins didn't believe him. On top of that, Borelli was a marginal worker with a poor attitude at best. Perkins figured, this could be just the opportunity he needed to get rid of him.

"Bad back! That's the most popular excuse I know to get out of work," the foreman replied.

"You don't have to take my word for it; I can get you a note from my doctor. I'm under treatment for my back."

"I don't have time to argue with you," Perkins said. "Either do what you're told, or clock out and take the consequences."

"What consequences?"

"Figure it out for yourself. Failing to follow an order is insubordination. It could cost you your job."

Borelli decided his health was more important than his job. He persisted in his refusal to lift the motors, and clocked out as he had been instructed.

Perkins returned to his desk and typed up a termination notice.

Question: How do you rate Perkins' chances of getting away with firing Borelli for insubordination?

Stryker's decision: When the foreman presented the notice to his boss for approval, Plant Engineer Herman Stryker asked, "What effort did you make to check Borelli's contention that he has a back problem? Did you send him to the nurse?"

"No. I didn't believe him for a minute. He's a lousy worker and lazy in the bargain. Back trouble is the standard excuse some of these guys use to get out of jobs they don't like."

"That may be so in this case. On the other hand, you may be wrong. If Borelli does have a legitimate back problem, his refusal to lift heavy units is reasonable and sensible. Keep in mind too that the quality of his work performance and attitude isn't the issue in this case. Your first responsibility is the safety and well-being of your people. It was your obligation to determine as best you can whether or not Borelli's health claim was valid. If it is, he's not guilty of insubordination. If you wish to fire him for unsatisfactory performance, this must be the basis of your termination notice."

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Bob Vavra
    FIVE FAST THINGS

    September 16, 2008
    What do the Chinese know, and what can we learn?
    1. Reaching across a great wall: Members of the Chinese Machine Tool and Tool Builders’ Associ...
    More
  • Bob Vavra
    Five Fast Things

    September 2, 2008
    Getting competitive on energy, getting tough on immigration
    1. One way to get competitive: We’ve highlighted the growing solar panel business around the U...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Photos

  • 2007 Product of the Year Winners
    This year's Plant Engineering Product of the Year winners were honored at the Manufacturing Summit in Chicago.
  • Top Plant: GEMA
    The game plan for GEMA (Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance) focuses on best-in-class execution
  • Top Plant: SEW Eurodrive
    SEW Eurodrive builds a culture based on employee empowerment and continuous improvement.
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Plant Engineering PlantMail!
Plant Engineering Hotwire
Plant Engineering Hotwire Automation
Plant Engineering Maintenance Connection
Plant Engineering Sustainable Manufacturing
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites