Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
FirstLight
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

How much employee negligence warrants discharge?

By Raymond Dreyfack -- Plant Engineering, 3/1/1998

The ultimate employee discipline is termination. Under what circumstances is it justified? Dishonesty, certainly. Violence resulting in damage to person or property, assuredly. Sexual malfeasance, decidedly.

What about negligence? In most cases dismissal would be too harsh a penalty. But each situation must be decided on its own merits.

Instrument Repairman Perry Shea was a marginal employee at best. Ill tempered, a heavy drinker. Macho. Maintenance department employees were encouraged to seek help in lifting an object too heavy or cumbersome for one person to handle.

Shea couldn't be bothered. He had muscle to spare. On one occasion, he picked up and dropped a heavy instrument, causing $560 damage. Maintenance Foreman Pete Schiffo instructed him in writing to ask for help in lifting or transporting heavy items in the future. A copy of the memo was placed in his personnel file. When it recurred 3-mo later, he was issued an official warning, which again became part of the record.

More recently, wrestling with a 65-lb piece of equipment, Shea, who had been drinking, tripped while trying to maneuver it through a doorway. The damage was estimated at $1300. Schiffo's response was short and simple. "That does it, Shea. You're fired."

Shea protested the action. "Dismissal is too harsh. Anyone can have an accident."

When Schiffo brushed aside his protest, Shea threatened to sue.

Question: If Shea follows through, how do you rate his chances of winning?

Krautkamer's verdict: When informed of the incident, Plant Engineer Edward Krautkamer's support of the decision was swift and decisive. "To sustain dismissal for carelessness or negligence, evidence of such negligence must be strong. Management must be ready to prove that the employee displayed an almost willful disregard of correct procedures with little, if any, regard for the consequences. It would be hard to argue that Shea doesn't fill the bill in this case."

And with that, Schiffo trotted off to deliver the message to Shea.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs

  • Bob Vavra
    Five Fast Things

    September 16, 2008
    What do the Chinese know, and what can we learn?
    1. Reaching across a great wall: Members of the Chinese Machine Tool and Tool Builders’ Associ...
    More
  • Bob Vavra
    Five Fast Things

    September 2, 2008
    Getting competitive on energy, getting tough on immigration
    1. One way to get competitive: We’ve highlighted the growing solar panel business around the U...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

  • 2007 Product of the Year Winners
    This year's Plant Engineering Product of the Year winners were honored at the Manufacturing Summit in Chicago.
  • Top Plant: GEMA
    The game plan for GEMA (Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance) focuses on best-in-class execution
  • Top Plant: SEW Eurodrive
    SEW Eurodrive builds a culture based on employee empowerment and continuous improvement.
Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Plant Engineering PlantMail!
Plant Engineering Hotwire
Plant Engineering Hotwire Automation
Plant Engineering Maintenance Connection
Plant Engineering Sustainable Manufacturing
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites

ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in few seconds.